Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36510093›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2023

Top-down modulation on depth processing: Visual searches for metric and ordinal depth information show a pattern of dissociation.

Ke Zhang, Jiehui Qian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ke ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Jiehui QianDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. qianjh3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-5714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depending on the goal, one can selectively process the metric depth or the ordinal depth information in the same scene. It is unknown whether the metric depth and ordinal depth information are processed through a shared or different underlying mechanisms. Here, we investigated the processing of the metric depth and ordinal depth using visual search. Items were presented at multiple depth planes defined by the binocular disparity, with one item per depth plane. In the metric-search task, participants were required to search for the target on a particular depth plane, among one to three distractors. In the ordinal-search task, the target was specified by its depth order indicated by numbers (smaller numbers indicated nearer depth planes). We found that the ordinal search was faster and more accurate than the metric search, and the data showed a pattern of dissociation. Metric search, but not ordinal search, was slowed when the target and distractors were closer in depth, while ordinal search was slower for the middle than the edge positions but metric search was unaffected. These two opposite effects suggest that metric depth and ordinal depth may be processed differently.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionVision DisparityHumansVisual PerceptionDepth perceptionMetric vs. ordinalTop-down modulationVisual search

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.