Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36510091›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2023

The bodily fundament of empathy: The role of action, nonaction-oriented, and interoceptive body representations.

Simona Raimo, Maddalena Boccia, Mariachiara Gaita, Silvia Canino, Valentina Torchia, Maria Antonietta Vetere, Antonella Di Vita, Liana Palermo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simona RaimoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. simona.raimo@unicz.it.
Maddalena BocciaDepartment of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mariachiara GaitaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Silvia CaninoDepartment of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Valentina TorchiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria Antonietta VetereDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Antonella Di VitaDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Liana PalermoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy. liana.palermo@unicz.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental representations with bodily contents or in various bodily formats have been suggested to play a pivotal role in social cognition, including empathy. However, there is a lack of systematic studies investigating, in the same sample of participants and using an individual differences approach, whether and to what extent the sensorimotor, perceptual, and interoceptive representations of the body could fulfill an explanatory role in the empathic abilities.To address this goal, we carried out two studies in which healthy adults were given measures of interoceptive sensibility (IS), action (aBR), and nonaction-oriented body representations (NaBR), and affective, cognitive, and motor empathy. A higher tendency to be self-focused on interoceptive signals predicted higher affective, cognitive, and motor empathy levels. A better performance in tasks probing aBR and NaBR predicted, respectively, higher motor and cognitive empathy levels.These findings support the view that the various facets of the empathic response are differently grounded in the body since they diversely involve representations with a different bodily format.Individual differences in the focus on one's internal body state representation can directly modulate all the components of the empathic experience. Instead, a body representation used interpersonally to represent both one's own body and others' bodies, in particular in its spatial specificity, could be necessary to accurately understand other people's minds (cognitive empathy), while a sensorimotor body representation used to represent both one's own body and others' bodies actions, could be fundamental for the self-awareness of feelings expressed in actions (motor empathy).

Indexed as

Body ImageEmpathyAdultEmotionsHumansBody representationBody schemaEmpathyInteroception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.