Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36509900›Full record

Observational studyJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

Optimal Predictors of Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy: Results from the Procalcitonin and C-reactive Protein for the Early Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leakage in Esophagogastric Surgery (PEDALES) Study.

Ferdinando Carlo Maria Cananzi, Alberto Biondi, Annamaria Agnes, Laura Ruspi, Federico Sicoli, Stefano De Pascale, Uberto Romario Fumagalli, Domenico D'Ugo, Vittorio Quagliuolo, Roberto Persiani and 1 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ferdinando Carlo Maria CananziDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.
Alberto BiondiFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli N. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. biondi.alberto@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2470-7858
Annamaria AgnesFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli N. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Laura RuspiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.
Federico SicoliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.
Stefano De PascaleUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito N.1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Uberto Romario FumagalliUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito N.1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Domenico D'UgoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli N. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Vittorio QuagliuoloSarcoma and Melanoma and Rare Tumors Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Roberto PersianiFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli N. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group (GIRCG)
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITHumanitas University · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to define whether procalcitonin (PCT) is an earlier and more accurate predictor than C-reactive protein (CRP) for anastomotic leakage (AL) and major infective complications (MICs).

methodsThis was a prospective multicentric observational study conducted in three Italian centers, including all patients undergoing gastrectomy from May 2016 to April 2021. The endpoint was the assessment of the discrimination and accuracy achieved by the PCT and CRP values measured from POD1 to POD7 for predicting the occurrence of AL and MICs. Accuracy was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) values and Youden's statistics. Two charts were created for risk stratification during the postoperative course.

resultsThe rate of AL was 4.6%, with a median day of occurrence on POD5 (range 3-26). The overall rate of major infective complications was 19.9%, with a median day of occurrence on POD6 (range 2-30). PCT showed a significant association with AL on POD6 and POD7 and a significant association with MICs on POD2, while CRP values showed a significant association with AL on POD4 and a significant association with MICs on POD1. No difference in the prediction of AL was observed between PCT and CRP, while CRP was found to be a superior predictor of major infective complications on POD5 (p = 0.024) and POD7 (p = 0.035).

conclusionsPCT was not superior to CRP as an early predictor of AL and major infective complications after gastrectomy. CRP should be used as the reference screening postoperative marker.

Indexed as

C-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninAnastomotic LeakBiomarkersEarly DiagnosisGastrectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninC-reactive proteinGastrectomyGastric cancerPostoperative complicationProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID36509900
OpenAlexW4311287933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.