Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36509867›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2023

Expectations, concerns, and attitudes regarding whole-genome sequencing studies: a survey of cancer patients, families, and the public in Japan.

Izen Ri, Junichi Kawata, Akiko Nagai, Kaori Muto

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Izen RiDepartment of Public Policy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8598-5368
Junichi KawataDepartment of Public Policy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko NagaiDepartment of Public Policy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaori MutoDepartment of Public Policy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. krmt@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) JP21cm0106001Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) JP22ama221001MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP18K09940Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan) JPMH20AD0101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is being used in research and clinical settings in cancer genomics. Studies show that cancer patients generally have positive attitudes toward tumor profiling tests; however, few works revealed their attitudes toward WGS. This study clarifies the expectations, concerns, and result preferences of cancer patients (CPs), family members (FMs) and general adults (GAs) regarding WGS study in Japan. We conducted an anonymous survey with 1204 CPs, 5958 FMs, and 2915 GAs in 2021. Despite low awareness of the WGS studies, CPs had the highest expectations for it. FMs had a higher level of concern than CPs and GAs; feeling anxious by knowing the results, being treated unfavorably if germline findings were detected. Both the FMs and CPs were highly concerned about the protection of genetic information. CPs preferred results with actionability, however, only half preferred to know germline findings. Given the possibility of detecting variants across multidisciplinary diseases and the long-term continuity of WGS research, a system is needed in which study participants can consult and receive decision-making support at any time according to their needs.

Indexed as

MotivationNeoplasmsAdultAttitudeGenome, HumanHumansJapan

Identifiers

PMID36509867
PMCPMC10040335
OpenAlexW4312093752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read29
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.