ArticleScientific reports2022
Evaluation of U-Net models in automated cervical spine and cranial bone segmentation using X-ray images for traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in lumbar radiography: bridging deep learning and clinical practice in low-resource environments.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Review
- An efficient deep learning based approach for automated identification of cervical vertebrae fracture as a clinical support aid.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI-Assisted Image Recognition of Cervical Spine Vertebrae in Dynamic X-Ray Recordings.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Can generative artificial intelligence provide accurate medical advice?: a case of ChatGPT versus Congress of Neurological Surgeons management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries clinical guidelines.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- The evolution of cervical spine trauma classification: a paradigm shift from morphological description to clinical decision-making.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- CervSpineNet: a hybrid deep learning-based approach for the segmentation of cervical spinous processes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A fully automated morphological analysis of yeast mitochondria from wide-field fluorescence images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Semantic segmentation of thermal defects in belt conveyor idlers using thermal image augmentation and U-Net-based convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Segmentation of the cervical spine in tandem with three cranial bones, hard palate, basion, and opisthion using X-ray images is crucial for measuring metrics used to diagnose traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation (TAOD). Previous studies utilizing automated segmentation methods have been limited to segmenting parts of the cervical spine (C3 ~ C7), due to difficulties in defining the boundaries of C1 and C2 bones. Additionally, there has yet to be a study that includes cranial bone segmentations necessary for determining TAOD diagnosing metrics, which are usually defined by measuring the distance between certain cervical (C1 ~ C7) and cranial (hard palate, basion, opisthion) bones. For this study, we trained a U-Net model on 513 sagittal X-ray images with segmentations of both cervical and cranial bones for an automated solution to segmenting important features for diagnosing TAOD. Additionally, we tested U-Net derivatives, recurrent residual U-Net, attention U-Net, and attention recurrent residual U-Net to observe any notable differences in segmentation behavior. The accuracy of U-Net models ranged from 99.07 to 99.12%, and dice coefficient values ranged from 88.55 to 89.41%. Results showed that all 4 tested U-Net models were capable of segmenting bones used in measuring TAOD metrics with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.