Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36509187›Full record

ArticleChemosphere2023

PFAS levels and exposure determinants in sensitive population groups.

L Fábelová, A Beneito, M Casas, A Colles, L Dalsager, E Den Hond, C Dereumeaux, K Ferguson, L Gilles, E Govarts and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemosphere, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Determinants of maternal and neonatal PFAS concentrations: a review.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The role of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in cognitive impairment and dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

L FábelováSlovak Medical University in Bratislava, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.
A BeneitoEpidemiology and Environmental Health Joint Research Unit, FISABIO-Universitat Jaume I-Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
M CasasISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain; Spanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5 28029 Madrid, Spain.
A CollesVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
L DalsagerInstitute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
E Den HondProvincial Institute of Hygiene (PIH), Antwerp, Belgium.
C DereumeauxSanté publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
K FergusonNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), North Carolina, USA.
L GillesVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
E GovartsVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
A IrizarSpanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5 28029 Madrid, Spain; Biodonostia, Epidemiology and Public Health Area, Environmental Epidemiology and Child Development Group, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain.
M J Lopez EspinosaEpidemiology and Environmental Health Joint Research Unit, FISABIO-Universitat Jaume I-Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain; Spanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5 28029 Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Nursing and Chiropody, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
P MontazeriISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.
B MorrensFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
H PatayováSlovak Medical University in Bratislava, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.
K RausováSlovak Medical University in Bratislava, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.
D RichterováSlovak Medical University in Bratislava, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia.
L Rodriguez MartinVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
L Santa-MarinaSpanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5 28029 Madrid, Spain; Biodonostia, Epidemiology and Public Health Area, Environmental Epidemiology and Child Development Group, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain; Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, Basque Government, 20013 San Sebastian, Spain.
T SchettgenInstitute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
G SchoetersVITO Health, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
L S HaugNorwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Oslo, Norway.
M UhlUmweltbundesamt, Vienna, Austria.
G D VillangerNorwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Oslo, Norway.
M VrijheidISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain; Spanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5 28029 Madrid, Spain.
C ZarosInstitut national d'études démographiques (INED), Aubervilliers, France.
Ľ Palkovičová MurínováSlovak Medical University in Bratislava, Faculty of Public Health, Department of Environmental Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia. Electronic address: lubica.murinova@szu.sk.

Funding

The Norwegian Mother And Child Study: Environmental Specimen CollectionZIAES044008 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 2009 to 2018
$4.3M
HSRD VA TPR 15-230Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES044008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent organic pollutants. The first exposure to PFAS occurs in utero, after birth it continues via breast milk, food intake, environment, and consumer products that contain these chemicals. Our aim was to identify determinants of PFAS concentrations in sensitive population subgroups- pregnant women and newborns.

methodsNine European birth cohorts provided exposure data on PFAS in pregnant women (INMA-Gipuzkoa, Sabadell, Valencia, ELFE and MoBa; total N = 5897) or newborns (3xG study, FLEHS 2, FLEHS 3 and PRENATAL; total N = 940). PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS and PFNA concentrations were measured in maternal or cord blood, depending on the cohort (FLEHS 2 measured only PFOS and PFOA). PFAS concentrations were analysed according to maternal characteristics (age, BMI, parity, previous breastfeeding, smoking, and food consumption during pregnancy) and parental educational level. The association between potential determinants and PFAS concentrations was evaluated using multiple linear regression models.

resultsWe observed significant variations in PFAS concentrations among cohorts. Higher PFAS concentrations were associated with higher maternal age, primipara birth, and educational level, both for maternal blood and cord blood. Higher PFAS concentrations in maternal blood were associated with higher consumption of fish and seafood, meat, offal and eggs. In cord blood, higher PFHxS concentrations were associated with daily meat consumption and higher PFNA with offal consumption. Daily milk and dairy consumption were associated with lower concentrations of PFAS in both, pregnant women and newborns.

conclusionHigh detection rates of the four most abundant PFAS demonstrate ubiquitous exposure of sensitive populations, which is of concern. This study identified several determinants of PFAS exposure in pregnant women and newborns, including dietary factors, and these findings can be used for proposing measures to reduce PFAS exposure, particularly from dietary sources.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsAnimalsDietFemaleHumansParityPregnancyVulnerable PopulationsAlkanesulfonic AcidsEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsCord bloodDeterminantsF ood consumptionMaternal bloodper- and polyfluoroalkyl substances

Identifiers

PMID36509187
PMCPMC9846180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.