Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36508354›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2022

Protective Benefits of Tending Ants to a Critically Endangered Butterfly.

Geena M Hill, Matthew D Trager, Andrea Lucky, Jaret C Daniels

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Geena M HillFlorida Natural Areas Inventory, Florida State University, 1018 Thomasville Road, #200-C, Tallahassee, FL 32303, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1433-5517
Matthew D TragerUS Forest Service, 325 John Knox Road, STE F-100, Tallahassee, FL 32303, USA.
Andrea LuckyEntomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620, USA.
Jaret C DanielsEntomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620, USA.
Florida Museum of Natural History · USFlorida State University · USUniversity of Florida · USUS Forest Service · US

Funding

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's F17AP00467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ants provide protection to various organisms via myrmecophilous relationships. Most notably, ants and several butterfly species are involved in mainly mutualistic interactions. Previous field studies have shown that butterfly larval survival is increased in the presence of tending ants, suggesting that ants are providing protection against insect predation or parasitism. Here, we conducted a series of timed observational trials under laboratory conditions to assess larval survival and ant protection from insect predators for a myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. We focused on a critically endangered butterfly, the Miami blue (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri) (Comstock and Huntington) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), and its most common ant associate, the Florida carpenter ant (Camponotus floridanus) (Buckley) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), to test this assumption of ant protection. We found that ants provide significant protection to Miami blue larvae, with later instar larvae receiving a higher level of protection due to differences in tending frequencies. These results will aid in informing conservation management and future organism reintroductions for this endangered butterfly.

Indexed as

AntsButterfliesAnimalsLarvaSymbiosisFormicidaeLepidopteraLycaenidaeMyrmecophily

Identifiers

PMID36508354
PMCPMC9744248
OpenAlexW4311418501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.