ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023
Physical and visual evaluations of CT image quality of large low-contrast objects with visual model-based iterative reconstruction technique: a phantom study.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gumbel distribution-based technique enables quantitative comparison between streak metal artifacts of multidetector row CT and cone-beam CT: a phantom study.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to verify whether the image quality of large low-contrast objects can be improved using visual model-based iterative reconstruction (VMR) while maintaining the visibility of conventional filtered back projection (FBP) and reducing radiation dose through physical and visual evaluation. A 64-row multi-slice CT system with SCENARIA View (FUJIFILM healthcare Corp. Tokyo, Japan) was used. The noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were physically evaluated. A low contrast object as a substitute for a liver mass was visually evaluated. In the noise measurement, STD1 showed an 18% lower noise compared to FBP. STR4 was able to reduce noise by 58% compared to FBP. The NPS of VMR was similar to those of FBP from low to high spatial frequency. The NPS of VMR reconstructions showed a similar variation with frequency as FBP reconstructions. STD1 showed the highest 10% TTF, and higher 10% TTF was observed with lower VMR level. The SNR of VMR was close to that of FBP, and higher SNR was observed with higher VMR level. In the results of the visual evaluation, there was no significant difference in visual evaluation between STD1 and FBP (p = 0.99) and between STD2 and FBP (p = 0.56). We found that the NPS of VMR images was similar to that of FBP images, and it can reduce noise and radiation dose by 25% and 50%, respectively, without decreasing the visual image quality compared to FBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36508073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.