Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36508047›Full record

ArticleActa diabetologica2023

Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in women with a family history of type 2 diabetes in first- and second-degree relatives.

Cécile Monod, Grammata Kotzaeridi, Tina Linder, Daniel Eppel, Ingo Rosicky, Valeria Filippi, Andrea Tura, Irene Hösli, Christian S Göbl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta diabetologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Molecular Variants inInternational journal of women's health · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cécile MonodDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5914-4517
Grammata KotzaeridiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-2607
Tina LinderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5929-1285
Daniel EppelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ingo RosickyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4443-2505
Valeria FilippiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4281-0517
Andrea TuraMetabolic Unit, CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-5900
Irene HösliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6209-8344
Christian S GöblDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. christian.goebl@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-7443
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHNeuroscience Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) markedly increases an individual's lifetime risk of developing the disease. For gestational diabetes (GDM), this risk factor is less well characterized. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between family history of T2DM in first- and second-degree relatives in women with GDM and the differences in metabolic characteristics at early gestation.

methodsThis prospective cohort study included 1129 pregnant women. A broad risk evaluation was performed before 16 + 0 weeks of gestation, including a detailed family history of the different types of diabetes and a laboratory examination of glucometabolic parameters. Participants were followed up until delivery and GDM assessed according to the latest diagnosis criteria.

resultsWe showed that pregnant women with first- (FHD1, 26.6%, OR 1.91, 95%CI 1.16 to 3.16, p = 0.005), second- (FHD2, 26.3%, OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.16 to 3.05, p = 0.005) or both first- and second-degree relatives with T2DM (FHD1 + D2, 33.3%, OR 2.64, 95%CI 1.41 to 4.94, p < 0.001) had a markedly increased risk of GDM compared to those with negative family history (FHN) (n = 100, 15.9%). The association was strongest if both parents were affected (OR 4.69, 95%CI 1.33 to 16.55, p = 0.009). Women with FHD1 and FHD1 + D2 had adverse glucometabolic profiles already in early pregnancy.

conclusionsFamily history of T2DM is an important risk factor for GDM, also by applying the current diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, we showed that the degree of kinship plays an essential role in quantifying the risk already at early pregnancy.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPregnancyPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsDegree of kinshipFamily historyGestational diabetesType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID36508047
PMCPMC9931850
OpenAlexW4311156859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.