Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36508035›Full record

SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023

Modeling methods for busulfan-induced oligospermia and asthenozoospermia in mice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ruiyang Pu, Jing Liu, Aiping Zhang, Jingli Yang, Wei Zhang, Xianzhen Long, Xiaoyu Ren, Honghao Hua, Dian Shi, Wei Zhang and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. 5-ALA/FeFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruiyang Pu *Department of Medical Zoology, School of Basic Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jing Liu *The Reproductive Medicine Hospital of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Aiping ZhangThe Reproductive Medicine Hospital of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Jingli YangInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Medical Zoology, School of Basic Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xianzhen LongInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xiaoyu RenDepartment of Medical Zoology, School of Basic Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Honghao HuaInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Dian ShiDepartment of Medical Zoology, School of Basic Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Wei ZhangThe Reproductive Medicine Hospital of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Lijun LiuThe Reproductive Medicine Hospital of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yanyan LiuInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yuanqin WuInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yana BaiInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Ning ChengDepartment of Medical Zoology, School of Basic Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. chengn@lzu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5743-2734
Lanzhou University · CNFirst Hospital of Lanzhou University · CN

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81673248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveModeling methods for busulfan-induced oligoasthenozoospermia are controversial. We aimed to systematically review the modeling method of busulfan-induced oligospermia and asthenozoospermia, and analyze changes in various evaluation indicators at different busulfan doses over time.

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed databases, Web of Science, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System until April 9, 2022. Animal experiments of busulfan-induced spermatogenesis dysfunction were included and screened. The model mortality and parameters of the evaluation indicators were subjected to meta-analysis.

resultsTwenty-nine animal studies were included (control/model: 669/1829). The mortality of mice increased with busulfan dose. Significant spermatogenesis impairment occurred within 5 weeks, regardless of busulfan dose (10-40 mg/kg). Testicular weight (weighted mean difference [WMD]: - 0.04, 95% CI: - 0.05, - 0.03), testicular index (WMD: - 2.10, 95% CI: - 2.43, - 1.76), and Johnsen score (WMD: - 4.67, 95% CI: - 5.99, - 3.35) were significantly decreased. The pooled sperm counts of the model group were reduced by 32.8 × 10

conclusionThe model using low-dose busulfan (10 - 20 mg/kg) returned to normal after 10 - 15 weeks. However, in some spermatogenesis cycles, testicular weight reduction and testicular spermatogenic function damage were not proportional to busulfan dose. Sperm counts and motility results in different studies had significant heterogeneity. Standard protocols for sperm assessment in animal models were needed to reduce heterogeneity between studies.

Indexed as

AsthenozoospermiaOligospermiaAnimalsBusulfanHumansMaleMiceSemenSperm CountSperm MotilityBusulfanAsthenospermiaBusulfanMouseOligoasthenospermiaOligospermiaSpermatogenic dysfunctionSystem evaluation

Identifiers

PMID36508035
PMCPMC9840741
OpenAlexW4311202952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.