ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023
[
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- ¹⁸F-sodium fluoride PET/CT as a complementary measure of osteoblastic disease burden in axial spondyloarthritis: a prospective exploratory study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Na[EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Automated segmentation of the sacro-iliac joints, posterior spinal joints and discovertebral units on low-dose computed tomography for Na[EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT as a Tool to Assess Enthesopathies in X-Linked Hypophosphatemia.Calcified tissue international · 2025Article
- From advanced imaging to molecular insights: the state of the art in omics for axial spondyloarthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
- Article
- Impact of bimekizumab and certolizumab pegol on efficacy, safety and osteoblastic activity in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results from a phase IIa, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, exploratory study with PET-CT imaging.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo relate [
methodsTen clinically active AS patients (female 6/10, age 38 ± 11 years) were included, and both spine and SI-joints were examined. PET scans were dichotomously scored for enhanced [
resultsIn the spine, 69 lesions with enhanced [
conclusion[ CLINICAL
trial registrationNL43223.029.13 registered at 02-05-2013. https://www.toetsingonline.nl/to/ccmo_search.nsf/fABRpop?readform&unids=C1257BA2002CC066C1257B4E0049A65A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.