ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023
Decentralized collaborative multi-institutional PET attenuation and scatter correction using federated deep learning.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-view scout scans with deep learning for ultra-low dose attenuation correction in PET.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Generalizable CT-free PET attenuation and scatter correction via few-shot cross domain adaptation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-site distributed training with data protections for PET-based synthetic CT.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence across oncologic theranostics: evidence for patient stratification, dosimetry, and adaptive radiopharmaceutical therapy.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026Review
- Estimating LVEF from ECG with GPT-4o Fine-Tuned Vision: A Novel Approach in AI-Driven Cardiac Diagnostics.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Enhanced direct joint attenuation and scatter correction of whole-body PET images via context-aware deep networks.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2025Article
- A CT-free deep-learning-based attenuation and scatter correction for copper-64 PET in different time-point scans.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Powered CT-Less Multitracer Organ Segmentation From PET Images: A Solution for Unreliable CT Segmentation in PET/CT Imaging.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-based analysis of whole-body bone scintigraphy: The quest for the optimal deep learning algorithm and comparison with human observer performance.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- The quest for multifunctional and dedicated PET instrumentation with irregular geometries.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Review
- Federated machine learning for predicting acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a multicenter study in Taiwan.Health information science and systems · 2023Article
- Differential privacy preserved federated transfer learning for multi-institutionalEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Single-Shot PET Image Artifact Detection and Disentanglement: Toward Routine Clinical Image Quality Assurance.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Improving Pancreatic Cyst Management: Artificial Intelligence-Powered Prediction of Advanced Neoplasms through Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Confocal Endomicroscopy.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A review of PET attenuation correction methods for PET-MR.EJNMMI physics · 2023Review
- Machine learning-based diagnosis and risk classification of coronary artery disease using myocardial perfusion imaging SPECT: A radiomics study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAttenuation correction and scatter compensation (AC/SC) are two main steps toward quantitative PET imaging, which remain challenging in PET-only and PET/MRI systems. These can be effectively tackled via deep learning (DL) methods. However, trustworthy, and generalizable DL models commonly require well-curated, heterogeneous, and large datasets from multiple clinical centers. At the same time, owing to legal/ethical issues and privacy concerns, forming a large collective, centralized dataset poses significant challenges. In this work, we aimed to develop a DL-based model in a multicenter setting without direct sharing of data using federated learning (FL) for AC/SC of PET images.
methodsNon-attenuation/scatter corrected and CT-based attenuation/scatter corrected (CT-ASC)
resultsIn terms of percent SUV absolute relative error (ARE%), both FL-SQ (CI:12.21-14.81%) and FL-PL (CI:11.82-13.84%) models demonstrated excellent agreement with the centralized framework (CI:10.32-12.00%), while FL-based algorithms improved model performance by over 11% compared to CB training strategy (CI: 22.34-26.10%). Furthermore, the Mann-Whitney test between different strategies revealed no significant differences between CZ and FL-based algorithms (p-value > 0.05) in center-categorized mode. At the same time, a significant difference was observed between the different training approaches on the overall dataset (p-value < 0.05). In addition, voxel-wise comparison, with respect to reference CT-ASC, exhibited similar performance for images predicted by CZ (R
conclusionDeep learning-based models provide promising results toward quantitative PET image reconstruction. Specifically, we developed two FL models and compared their performance with center-based and centralized models. The proposed FL-based models achieved higher performance compared to center-based models, comparable with centralized models. Our work provided strong empirical evidence that the FL framework can fully benefit from the generalizability and robustness of DL models used for AC/SC in PET, while obviating the need for the direct sharing of datasets between clinical imaging centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.