Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36508026›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

Decentralized collaborative multi-institutional PET attenuation and scatter correction using federated deep learning.

Isaac Shiri, Alireza Vafaei Sadr, Azadeh Akhavan, Yazdan Salimi, Amirhossein Sanaat, Mehdi Amini, Behrooz Razeghi, Abdollah Saberi, Hossein Arabi, Sohrab Ferdowsi and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Differential privacy preserved federated transfer learning for multi-institutionalEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Isaac ShiriDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Alireza Vafaei SadrDepartment of Theoretical Physics and Center for Astroparticle Physics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Azadeh AkhavanDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Yazdan SalimiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Amirhossein SanaatDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Mehdi AminiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Behrooz RazeghiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abdollah SaberiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Hossein ArabiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Sohrab FerdowsiHES-SO, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Slava VoloshynovskiyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Deniz GündüzDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Arman RahmimDepartments of Radiology and Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Habib ZaidiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland. habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7559-5297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAttenuation correction and scatter compensation (AC/SC) are two main steps toward quantitative PET imaging, which remain challenging in PET-only and PET/MRI systems. These can be effectively tackled via deep learning (DL) methods. However, trustworthy, and generalizable DL models commonly require well-curated, heterogeneous, and large datasets from multiple clinical centers. At the same time, owing to legal/ethical issues and privacy concerns, forming a large collective, centralized dataset poses significant challenges. In this work, we aimed to develop a DL-based model in a multicenter setting without direct sharing of data using federated learning (FL) for AC/SC of PET images.

methodsNon-attenuation/scatter corrected and CT-based attenuation/scatter corrected (CT-ASC)

resultsIn terms of percent SUV absolute relative error (ARE%), both FL-SQ (CI:12.21-14.81%) and FL-PL (CI:11.82-13.84%) models demonstrated excellent agreement with the centralized framework (CI:10.32-12.00%), while FL-based algorithms improved model performance by over 11% compared to CB training strategy (CI: 22.34-26.10%). Furthermore, the Mann-Whitney test between different strategies revealed no significant differences between CZ and FL-based algorithms (p-value > 0.05) in center-categorized mode. At the same time, a significant difference was observed between the different training approaches on the overall dataset (p-value < 0.05). In addition, voxel-wise comparison, with respect to reference CT-ASC, exhibited similar performance for images predicted by CZ (R

conclusionDeep learning-based models provide promising results toward quantitative PET image reconstruction. Specifically, we developed two FL models and compared their performance with center-based and centralized models. The proposed FL-based models achieved higher performance compared to center-based models, comparable with centralized models. Our work provided strong empirical evidence that the FL framework can fully benefit from the generalizability and robustness of DL models used for AC/SC in PET, while obviating the need for the direct sharing of datasets between clinical imaging centers.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAttenuation correctionDeep learningDistributed learningFederated learningPET

Identifiers

PMID36508026
PMCPMC9742659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.