Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507899›Full record

ArticleDomain adaptation and representation transfer : 4th MICCAI Workshop, DART 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 22, 2022, proceedings. Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer (Workshop) (4th : 2022 : Sin...2022

Discriminative, Restorative, and Adversarial Learning: Stepwise Incremental Pretraining.

Zuwei Guo, Nahid Ui Islam, Michael B Gotway, Jianming Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Domain adaptation and representation transfer : 4th MICCAI Workshop, DART 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 22, 2022, proceedings. Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer (Workshop) (4th : 2022 : Sin..., 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Autodidactic dense anatomical models.Medical image analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zuwei GuoArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Nahid Ui IslamArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Michael B GotwayMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
Jianming LiangArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.

Funding

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Pulmonary EmbolismR01HL128785 · NHLBI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI LIANG, JIANMING · 2016 to 2019
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uniting three self-supervised learning (SSL) ingredients (discriminative, restorative, and adversarial learning) enables collaborative representation learning and yields three transferable components: a discriminative encoder, a restorative decoder, and an adversary encoder. To leverage this advantage, we have redesigned five prominent SSL methods, including Rotation, Jigsaw, Rubik's Cube, Deep Clustering, and TransVW, and formulated each in a

Indexed as

Adversarial learningDiscriminative learningRestorative learningSelf-supervised learningStepwise pretrainingUnited framework

Identifiers

PMID36507899
PMCPMC9728134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.