Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507873›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2023

Epistemic Rights and Responsibilities of Digital Simulacra for Biomedicine.

Mildred K Cho, Nicole Martinez-Martin

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rethinking Ethics for an Era of Trusted Computational Tools.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mildred K ChoStanford Center for Biomedical Ethics.ORCID 0000-0003-1669-3932
Nicole Martinez-MartinStanford Center for Biomedical Ethics.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-0462

Funding

The Stanford Training Program in ELSI ResearchT32HG008953 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mildred K. Cho, Meghan Halley · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
Integrating Ethics into Machine Learning for Precision MedicineR01HG010476 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHO, MILDRED K., SANKAR, PAMELA L · 2019 to 2021
$1.8M
Ethical, Legal and Social Implications in the Use of Digital Technology for Mental Health ApplicationsK01MH118375 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MARTINEZ-MARTIN, NICOLE A · 2019 to 2022
$508k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010476NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG008953NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH118375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Big data and AI have enabled digital simulation for prediction of future health states or behaviors of specific individuals, populations or humans in general. "Digital simulacra" use multimodal datasets to develop computational models that are virtual representations of people or groups, generating predictions of how systems evolve and react to interventions over time. These include digital twins and virtual patients for

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationBig DataHumansartificial intelligencebig datadigital twinsepistemic rightsvirtual patients

Identifiers

PMID36507873
PMCPMC10258225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.