Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507814›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2022

Public knowledge and information sources for clinical trials among adults in the USA: evidence from a Health Information National Trends Survey in 2020.

Sandhya Yadav, Alissa Todd, Krupal Patel, Amir A Tabriz, Oliver Nguyen, Kea Turner, Young-Rock Hong

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19 clinical trial participation and awareness in Texas.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recommending Clinical Trials for Online Patient Cases using Artificial Intelligence.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandhya YadavUniversity of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, USA.
Alissa ToddUniversity of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, USA.
Krupal PatelMoffitt Cancer Center Tampa, USA.
Amir A TabrizMoffitt Cancer Center Tampa, USA and University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Oliver NguyenMoffitt Cancer Center Tampa, USA.
Kea TurnerMoffitt Cancer Center Tampa, USA and University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Young-Rock HongUniversity of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, USA youngrock.h@phhp.ufl.edu.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLack of clinical trial awareness has been identified as a barrier to clinical trial recruitment. Identifying factors associated with clinical trial knowledge could inform ongoing efforts to improve diversity in clinical trials.

methodsUsing data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2020, we examined the knowledge of clinical trials, associated characteristics, sources of clinical trial information and motives to participate in clinical trials among the general population in the USA.

resultsOf 3,772 US adults, 41.3% reported not knowing about clinical trials. Prevalence of having no knowledge of clinical trials was higher among Hispanic adults (51.8%) and non-Hispanic Black adults (41.8%) compared with non-Hispanic White adults (37.4%; p=0.013). Other significant predictors of knowledge about clinical trials included higher education, online health information-seeking behaviour and patient portal access. Most respondents (73.2%) reported that healthcare providers were the most trusted source of information. Helping other people (71.6%) was the primary motivation for clinical trial participation, followed by financial compensation (12.5%) and receiving better treatment (5.1%).

conclusionThere is a gap in knowledge about clinical trials among the US population. Development of multimodal approaches, including online and offline information broadcasting, is needed to improve knowledge and clinical trial recruitment in diverse populations.

Indexed as

EthnicityInformation SourcesAdultHealth PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTrustclinical trialpublic knowledgerecruitment

Identifiers

PMID36507814
PMCPMC9595001
OpenAlexW4294898067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.