Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507780›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2023

In-silico generation of high-dimensional immune response data in patients using a deep neural network.

Ramin Fallahzadeh, Neda H Bidoki, Ina A Stelzer, Martin Becker, Ivana Marić, Alan L Chang, Anthony Culos, Thanaphong Phongpreecha, Maria Xenochristou, Davide De Francesco and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Just how transformative will AI/ML be for immuno-oncology?Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ramin FallahzadehDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Neda H BidokiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Ina A StelzerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Martin BeckerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Ivana MarićDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Alan L ChangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Anthony CulosDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Thanaphong PhongpreechaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Maria XenochristouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Davide De FrancescoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Camilo EspinosaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Eloise BersonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Franck VerdonkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Martin S AngstDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Brice GaudilliereDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Nima AghaeepourDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-8764

Funding

Machine Learning for Integrative Modeling of the Immune System in Clinical SettingsR35GM138353 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI AGHAEEPOUR, NIMA · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Neuromodulation of maternal immune adaptations in pregnancyK99HD105016 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STELZER, INA · 2021 to 2022
$263k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD105016NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technologies for single-cell profiling of the immune system have enabled researchers to extract rich interconnected networks of cellular abundance, phenotypical and functional cellular parameters. These studies can power machine learning approaches to understand the role of the immune system in various diseases. However, the performance of these approaches and the generalizability of the findings have been hindered by limited cohort sizes in translational studies, partially due to logistical demands and costs associated with longitudinal data collection in sufficiently large patient cohorts. An evolving challenge is the requirement for ever-increasing cohort sizes as the dimensionality of datasets grows. We propose a deep learning model derived from a novel pipeline of optimal temporal cell matching and overcomplete autoencoders that uses data from a small subset of patients to learn to forecast an entire patient's immune response in a high dimensional space from one timepoint to another. In our analysis of 1.08 million cells from patients pre- and post-surgical intervention, we demonstrate that the generated patient-specific data are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to real patient data by demonstrating fidelity, diversity, and usefulness.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerHumansProteomicsautoencodersdeep learninggenerative modelingmass cytometrysingle-cell Immunomesurgery

Identifiers

PMID36507780
PMCPMC10182197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.