Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507739›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53

Implementing Task-Shared Child and Adolescent Psychological Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

Alexandra L Rose, Helen E Jack, Christine Wan, Emilia Toloza, Kavya Bhattiprolu, Meera Ragunathan, Karen T G Schwartz, Jessica F Magidson

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra L RoseDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-0834
Helen E JackDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-2815-4725
Christine WanDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park.
Emilia TolozaDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park.
Kavya BhattiproluDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park.
Meera RagunathanDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park.
Karen T G SchwartzDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park.ORCID 0000-0003-4036-0281
Jessica F MagidsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park.ORCID 0000-0002-3513-3255
University of Maryland, College Park · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Practice facilitation and supervision to strengthen depression treatment in primary care in ZimbabweK23MH129420 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Helen Elizabeth Jack · 2022 to 2026
$922k
Effectiveness and implementation of pre-training interpersonal skills assessment of community health workers in South Africa to predict post-training competence in mental health careF31MH123020 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI ROSE, ALEXANDRA LEAH · 2021 to 2023
$127k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH123020NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH129420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEffective "task shared," or nonspecialist delivered, psychological interventions for children and adolescents have been developed or adapted in low- and middle-income countries with the aim of closing the global treatment gap for youth mental health care. Yet, delivery remains limited, in part due to the lack of knowledge of associated implementation, or process, outcomes. This scoping review aims to describe, examine the quality of, and synthesize findings on implementation outcomes of child and adolescent psychological interventions in low-and middle-income countries.

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo were searched for studies on child and adolescent psychological interventions in low- and middle-income countries reporting on implementation outcomes. After abstract and full-text review, data were extracted and summarized on implementation outcomes and quality of implementation outcomes reporting. Implementation barriers and recommendations for addressing barriers were also charted and narratively synthesized.

resultsOut of 5,207 manuscripts, 86 met inclusion criteria. Younger children were underrepresented. Studies largely reported feasibility and acceptability and did not state hypotheses or use conceptual models. Barriers primarily related to interventions being too complex, not an acceptable fit with participant cultures, and facilitators lacking time for or experiencing distress delivering interventions. Recommendations focused on increasing intervention fit and flexibility, training and support for facilitators, and linkages with existing systems.

conclusionsRigorous, broader implementation outcomes research is needed within child and adolescent psychological intervention research in low-and middle-income countries. Current evidence suggests the importance of the further developing strategies to increase acceptability to participants and better support facilitators.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesMental Health ServicesPsychosocial InterventionAdolescentChildHumans

Identifiers

PMID36507739
PMCPMC10258230
OpenAlexW4311159554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.