Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507700›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023

Effects of Silage Diet on Meat Quality through Shaping Gut Microbiota in Finishing Pigs.

Jiakuan Niu, Xiao Liu, Junying Xu, Fen Li, Jincan Wang, Xixi Zhang, Xu Yang, Lin Wang, Sen Ma, Defeng Li and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiakuan Niu *College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xiao Liu *College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Junying XuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Fen LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jincan WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xixi ZhangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xu YangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Lin WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Sen MaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Defeng LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xiaoyan ZhuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Chengzhang WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yinghua ShiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yalei CuiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-9930
Henan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increasing demand for high-quality pork, development of green and healthy feed for finishing pigs is urgently needed. In this study, the effects and mechanisms of mulberry and paper mulberry silages on growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal health of finishing pigs were explored. Intestinal microbiota were profiled, and microbially produced short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were measured. The average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion rate (FCR) with mulberry and paper mulberry silages were not significantly different from those of the control. Meat quality as measured by pork marbling and fatty acids in the longissimus dorsi was better with mulberry silage. The highest concentration of SCFAs was also with mulberry silage. According to 16S rRNA sequencing,

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeSilageAnimal FeedAnimalsDietFatty AcidsFatty Acids, VolatileMeatRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineFatty AcidsFatty Acids, VolatileRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sfinishing pigsgut microbiotameat qualitymulberry silagepaper mulberry silageSCFAs

Identifiers

PMID36507700
PMCPMC9927310
OpenAlexW4311205107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.