Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507497›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Nordic survey on assessment and treatment of fluid overload in intensive care.

Emilie Zeuthen, Sine Wichmann, Martin Schønemann-Lund, Mikko J Järvisalo, Rebecka Rubenson-Wahlin, Martin I Sigurðsson, Erling Holen, Morten H Bestle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Emilie ZeuthenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, North Zealand, Denmark.
Sine WichmannDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, North Zealand, Denmark.
Martin Schønemann-LundDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, North Zealand, Denmark.
Mikko J JärvisaloPerioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Rebecka Rubenson-WahlinDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin I SigurðssonDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Erling HolenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Helse Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Morten H BestleDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, North Zealand, Denmark.
Zealand University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKKarolinska Institutet · SEStavanger University Hospital · NOTurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Iceland · IS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Fluid overload in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with higher mortality. There are few randomized controlled trials to guide physicians in treating patients with fluid overload in the ICU, and no guidelines exist. We aimed to elucidate how ICU physicians from Nordic countries define, assess, and treat fluid overload in the ICU. Materials and methods: We developed an online questionnaire with 18 questions. The questions were pre-tested and revised by specialists in intensive care medicine. Through a network of national coordinators. The survey was distributed to a wide range of Nordic ICU physicians. The distribution started on January 5th, 2022 and ended on May 6th, 2022. Results: We received a total of 1,066 responses from Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Iceland. When assessing fluid status, respondents applied clinical parameters such as clinical examination findings, cumulative fluid balance, body weight, and urine output more frequently than cardiac/lung ultrasound, radiological appearances, and cardiac output monitoring. A large proportion of the respondents agreed that a 5% increase or more in body weight from baseline supported the diagnosis of fluid overload. The preferred de-resuscitation strategy was diuretics (91%), followed by minimization of maintenance (76%) and resuscitation fluids (71%). The majority declared that despite mild hypotension, mild hypernatremia, and ongoing vasopressor, they would not withhold treatment of fluid overload and would continue diuretics. The respondents were divided when it came to treating fluid overload with loop diuretics in patients receiving noradrenaline. Around 1% would not administer noradrenaline and diuretics simultaneously and 35% did not have a fixed upper limit for the dosage. The remaining respondents 63% reported different upper limits of noradrenaline infusion (0.05-0.50 mcg/kg/min) when administering loop diuretics. Conclusion: Self-reported practices among Nordic ICU physicians when assessing, diagnosing, and treating fluid overload reveals variability in the practice. A 5% increase in body weight was considered a minimum to support the diagnosis of fluid overload. Clinical examination findings were preferred for assessing, diagnosing and treating fluid overload, and diuretics were the preferred treatment modality.

Indexed as

de-resuscitationdiureticsfluid accumulationfluid overloadfluid removalICUsurvey

Identifiers

PMID36507497
PMCPMC9732460
OpenAlexW4309933705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.