Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507477›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2022

Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges-a narrative review.

Markus von Deimling, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Benjamin Pradere, Maximilian Pallauf, Jakob Klemm, Margit Fisch, Shahrokh F Shariat, Michael Rink

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women.Translational andrology and urology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Markus von DeimlingDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ekaterina LaukhtinaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Maximilian PallaufDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jakob KlemmDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Margit FischDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Shahrokh F Shariat *Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael Rink *Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATAl-Ahliyya Amman University · JOMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Standard radical cystectomy (RC) in women includes the removal of the bladder, urethra, uterus with the adnexa, and the anterior vaginal wall, thereby severely affecting the urinary, sexual, and reproductive system. To limit these detrimental effects, organ-sparing, including nerve-sparing approaches, have been developed. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional outcomes are, indeed, becoming increasingly central to the shared decision-making with the patient. The objectives of this narrative review are: (I) to review the current status of RC in women, including the use of different urinary diversions (UDs); (II) to discuss organ-sparing approaches and their impact on oncological and functional outcomes in women; (III) to discuss the impact of RC on HRQOL and sexual function in women. Methods: We performed a non-systematic literature review of the available publications in the PubMed database. Key Content and Findings: Over the past years, gender differences in oncological and functional outcomes after RC have received increased attention. According to the currently available literature, organ-sparing approaches can be safely performed in well-selected women without negatively impacting oncological outcomes. The orthotopic neobladder is feasible and oncologically safe in well-selected and informed women. The choice of the UD should be based on comprehensive counseling and the patient's comorbidities and preferences. There still is a lack of data on sexual recovery after the different surgical approaches aimed to mitigate sexual dysfunction in women undergoing RC. Conclusions: Pre-and post-operative counseling and support of females undergoing RC regarding their expectations and experiences in terms of quality of life and functional and sexual outcomes are currently insufficient. Well-designed studies in this field are necessary to further improve outcomes of women treated with RC with an overarching aim to close the gender gap in managing women with bladder cancer.

Indexed as

functional outcomesnerve-sparingorgan-sparingRadical cystectomy (RC)women

Identifiers

PMID36507477
PMCPMC9732696
OpenAlexW4310372851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.