ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2022
Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women: techniques, outcomes, and challenges-a narrative review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sexual rehabilitation across the cystectomy care pathway: pragmatic guidance for multidisciplinary teams; a narrative review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Article
- How to Minimize Hyper-Continence After Intracorporeal Robotic Neobladder Configuration in Women? The Three-Layer Posterior Reconstruction During Florence Robotic IntraCorporeal Neobladder (FloRIN).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Opportunistic salpingectomy during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review of the literature.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Female Sexual Function After Radical Treatment for MIBC: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Female Sexual Function After Radical Cystectomy: A Cross-sectional Study.European urology open science · 2024Article
- Pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy versus standard radical cystectomy in female patients diagnosed with bladder cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- The current role of pentafecta in the reporting of radical cystectomy outcomes: a scoping review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Prospective evaluation of sexual health following radical cystectomy due to bladder cancer.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
- Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in women.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Standard radical cystectomy (RC) in women includes the removal of the bladder, urethra, uterus with the adnexa, and the anterior vaginal wall, thereby severely affecting the urinary, sexual, and reproductive system. To limit these detrimental effects, organ-sparing, including nerve-sparing approaches, have been developed. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional outcomes are, indeed, becoming increasingly central to the shared decision-making with the patient. The objectives of this narrative review are: (I) to review the current status of RC in women, including the use of different urinary diversions (UDs); (II) to discuss organ-sparing approaches and their impact on oncological and functional outcomes in women; (III) to discuss the impact of RC on HRQOL and sexual function in women. Methods: We performed a non-systematic literature review of the available publications in the PubMed database. Key Content and Findings: Over the past years, gender differences in oncological and functional outcomes after RC have received increased attention. According to the currently available literature, organ-sparing approaches can be safely performed in well-selected women without negatively impacting oncological outcomes. The orthotopic neobladder is feasible and oncologically safe in well-selected and informed women. The choice of the UD should be based on comprehensive counseling and the patient's comorbidities and preferences. There still is a lack of data on sexual recovery after the different surgical approaches aimed to mitigate sexual dysfunction in women undergoing RC. Conclusions: Pre-and post-operative counseling and support of females undergoing RC regarding their expectations and experiences in terms of quality of life and functional and sexual outcomes are currently insufficient. Well-designed studies in this field are necessary to further improve outcomes of women treated with RC with an overarching aim to close the gender gap in managing women with bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.