Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507382›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

A novel bacterial strain

Hongxiao Yu, Wen-Juan Chen, Kalpana Bhatt, Zhe Zhou, Xixian Zhu, Siqi Liu, Jiehua He, Lian-Hui Zhang, Shaohua Chen, Huishan Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The IsolatePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongxiao YuDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Wen-Juan ChenDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Kalpana BhattDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukula Kangri University, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India.
Zhe ZhouDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xixian ZhuDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Siqi LiuDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiehua HeDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Lian-Hui ZhangDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Shaohua ChenDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Huishan WangDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Lisheng LiaoDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
South China Agricultural University · CNGurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalaya · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vast quantities of synthetic pesticides have been widely applied in various fields to kill plant pathogens, resulting in increased pathogen resistance and decreased effectiveness of such chemicals. In addition, the increased presence of pesticide residues affects living organisms and the environment largely on a global scale. To mitigate the impact of crop diseases more sustainably on plant health and productivity, there is a need for more safe and more eco-friendly strategies as compared to chemical prevention. Quorum sensing (QS) is an intercellular communication mechanism in a bacterial population, through which bacteria adjust their population density and behavior upon sensing the levels of signaling molecules in the environment. As an alternative, quorum quenching (QQ) is a promising new strategy for disease control, which interferes with QS by blocking intercellular communication between pathogenic bacteria to suppress the expression of disease-causing genes. Black rot caused by

Indexed as

biocontrolBurkholderiadiffusible signal factor (DSF)plant diseasesquorum quenchingquorum sensing

Identifiers

PMID36507382
PMCPMC9730286
OpenAlexW4309852217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.