Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507363›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Factors underlying masking release by voice-gender differences and spatial separation cues in multi-talker listening environments in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Yonghee Oh, Curtis L Hartling, Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan, Anna C Diedesch, Frederick J Gallun, Lina A J Reiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Binaural fusion: Complexities in definition and measurement.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Review
  12. Fusion of dichotic consonants in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listenersa).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yonghee OhDepartment of Otolaryngology and Communicative Disorders, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
Curtis L HartlingDepartment of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Nirmal Kumar SrinivasanDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, Towson University, Towson, MD, United States.
Anna C DiedeschDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, United States.
Frederick J GallunNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.
Lina A J ReissNational Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States.

Funding

Binaural Spectral Integration with Hearing Loss and Hearing Devices (Administrative Supplement)R01DC013307 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, LINA A. · 2014 to 2023
$4.7M
Effects of temporal cues on binaural pitch fusion in hearing impaired listenersF32DC016193 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI OH, YONGHEE · 2017 to 2018
$106k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC016193NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voice-gender differences and spatial separation are important cues for auditory object segregation. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship of voice-gender difference benefit to the breadth of binaural pitch fusion, the perceptual integration of dichotic stimuli that evoke different pitches across ears, and the relationship of spatial separation benefit to localization acuity, the ability to identify the direction of a sound source. Twelve bilateral hearing aid (HA) users (age from 30 to 75 years) and eleven normal hearing (NH) listeners (age from 36 to 67 years) were tested in the following three experiments. First, speech-on-speech masking performance was measured as the threshold target-to-masker ratio (TMR) needed to understand a target talker in the presence of either same- or different-gender masker talkers. These target-masker gender combinations were tested with two spatial configurations (maskers co-located or 60° symmetrically spatially separated from the target) in both monaural and binaural listening conditions. Second, binaural pitch fusion range measurements were conducted using harmonic tone complexes around a 200-Hz fundamental frequency. Third, absolute localization acuity was measured using broadband (125-8000 Hz) noise and one-third octave noise bands centered at 500 and 3000 Hz. Voice-gender differences between target and maskers improved TMR thresholds for both listener groups in the binaural condition as well as both monaural (left ear and right ear) conditions, with greater benefit in co-located than spatially separated conditions. Voice-gender difference benefit was correlated with the breadth of binaural pitch fusion in the binaural condition, but not the monaural conditions, ruling out a role of monaural abilities in the relationship between binaural fusion and voice-gender difference benefits. Spatial separation benefit was not significantly correlated with absolute localization acuity. In addition, greater spatial separation benefit was observed in NH listeners than in bilateral HA users, indicating a decreased ability of HA users to benefit from spatial release from masking (SRM). These findings suggest that sharp binaural pitch fusion may be important for maximal speech perception in multi-talker environments for both NH listeners and bilateral HA users.

Indexed as

binaural pitch fusionhearing aid (HA)hearing losslocalization acuityspatial release from maskingvoice-gender release from masking

Identifiers

PMID36507363
PMCPMC9726925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.