ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022
An interpretable approach for automatic aesthetic assessment of remote sensing images.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increase of remote sensing images in recent decades has resulted in their use in non-scientific fields such as environmental protection, education, and art. In this situation, we need to focus on the aesthetic assessment of remote sensing, which has received little attention in research. While according to studies on human brain's attention mechanism, certain areas of an image can trigger visual stimuli during aesthetic evaluation. Inspired by this, we used convolutional neural network (CNN), a deep learning model resembling the human neural system, for image aesthetic assessment. So we propose an interpretable approach for automatic aesthetic assessment of remote sensing images. Firstly, we created the Remote Sensing Aesthetics Dataset (RSAD). We collected remote sensing images from Google Earth, designed the four evaluation criteria of remote sensing image aesthetic quality-color harmony, light and shadow, prominent theme, and visual balance-and then labeled the samples based on expert photographers' judgment on the four evaluation criteria. Secondly, we feed RSAD into the ResNet-18 architecture for training. Experimental results show that the proposed method can accurately identify visually pleasing remote sensing images. Finally, we provided a visual explanation of aesthetic assessment by adopting Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) to highlight the important image area that influenced model's decision. Overall, this paper is the first to propose and realize automatic aesthetic assessment of remote sensing images, contributing to the non-scientific applications of remote sensing and demonstrating the interpretability of deep-learning based image aesthetic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.