ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022
An efficient computer vision-based approach for acute lymphoblastic leukemia prediction.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incorporating artificial intelligence into morphological diagnosis of acute leukemias: Current landscape, challenges and prospects (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Predictive role of the muscle quality index for testosterone deficiency in adult males based on interpretable machine learning methods.BMC public health · 2025Article
- An improved multiclass classification of acute lymphocytic leukemia using enhanced glowworm swarm optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An efficient leukemia prediction method using machine learning and deep learning with selected features.PloS one · 2025Article
- Hybrid deep layered network model based on multi-scale feature extraction and deep feature optimization for acute lymphoblastic leukemia anomaly detection.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- An explainable deep learning-based feature fusion model for acute lymphoblastic leukemia diagnosis and severity assessment.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Hybrid Feature-Learning-Based PSO-PCA Feature Engineering Approach for Blood Cancer Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Hybrid Techniques for the Diagnosis of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on Fusion of CNN Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Computer-Aided Diagnosis System for Blood Diseases Using EfficientNet-B3 Based on a Dynamic Learning Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leukemia (blood cancer) diseases arise when the number of White blood cells (WBCs) is imbalanced in the human body. When the bone marrow produces many immature WBCs that kill healthy cells, acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) impacts people of all ages. Thus, timely predicting this disease can increase the chance of survival, and the patient can get his therapy early. Manual prediction is very expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, automated prediction techniques are essential. In this research, we propose an ensemble automated prediction approach that uses four machine learning algorithms K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Naive Bayes (NB). The C-NMC leukemia dataset is used from the Kaggle repository to predict leukemia. Dataset is divided into two classes cancer and healthy cells. We perform data preprocessing steps, such as the first images being cropped using minimum and maximum points. Feature extraction is performed to extract the feature using pre-trained Convolutional Neural Network-based Deep Neural Network (DNN) architectures (VGG19, ResNet50, or ResNet101). Data scaling is performed by using the MinMaxScaler normalization technique. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and Random Forest (RF) as feature Selection techniques. Classification machine learning algorithms and ensemble voting are applied to selected features. Results reveal that SVM with 90.0% accuracy outperforms compared to other algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.