ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2022
The Impact of Living with Clubfoot on Children and Their Families: Perspectives from Two Cultural Environments.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A global core outcome set for orthopaedic interventions in children with spinal dysraphism : aiming to enhance research quality and patient outcomes.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Current Clubfoot Practices: POSNA Membership Survey.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the physical, emotional and social impact of clubfoot on the lives of affected children and their families. Methods: A purposive sample of children with treated idiopathic clubfoot and their parents was recruited from two geographical locations-the United Kingdom (UK) and India. Children were divided into age groups of 5-7 and 8-11 years. Questionnaires were administered separately to children and parents; the former comprised multiple-choice questions scored using an 'emoji' system, and the latter included open-ended questions divided into pre-defined themes of daily limitations, social life, general health, emotional barriers and family impact. Results: Thirty-four children and parents participated from UK; 96 children and parents participated from India. The majority of children (> 80%) reported no problems in daily activities, although 32.8% reported having pain. Difficulty finding appropriate footwear and limitation in sports were more common among UK children, whereas difficulty in squatting was more problematic for Indian children. Self and emotional perceptions regarding their appearance/condition were lower among older as compared to younger children in both countries. Parents' responses mirrored those of children; additionally they reported emotional and financial difficulties during initial treatment phase, and ongoing concerns about the future during the maintenance phase. Conclusion: Treated clubfoot continues to impact the lives of affected children and families. Perceptions of the condition and its impact vary between population groups; this needs to be appreciated when collecting and analysing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.