Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507215›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2022

The Role of Riluzole in Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with Incomplete Neurological Deficit: A Prospective, Randomised Controlled Study.

Dinesh Kumarasamy, Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, Guna K Pratheep, Rishi Mukesh Kanna, S Rajasekaran

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The neuroprotective role of riluzole in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Spinal cord injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dinesh KumarasamyDepartment of Spine Surgery, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Sai Baba Colony, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641001 India.
Vibhu Krishnan ViswanathanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Sai Baba Colony, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641001 India.
Ajoy Prasad ShettyDepartment of Spine Surgery, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Sai Baba Colony, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641001 India.ORCID 0000-0001-5885-7152
Guna K PratheepDepartment of Spine Surgery, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Sai Baba Colony, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641001 India.
Rishi Mukesh KannaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Sai Baba Colony, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641001 India.
S RajasekaranDepartment of Spine Surgery, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Sai Baba Colony, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641001 India.
Ganga Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Riluzole, a benzothiazole sodium channel blocker is acknowledged as a neuroprotective agent in spinal cord injury (SCI). Most of this evidence is based on pre-clinical studies and its effectiveness in clinical setting is undetermined, heretofore. Methods: A prospective, randomised-controlled study was conducted between April 2019 and March 2020 at a tertiary-level centre. Patients aged 18-65 years with sub-axial cervical spine injury, who presented within 72 h of injury with incomplete neuro-deficit, were included. They were randomised into groups A (riluzole was administered) and B (no adjuvants). All patients were followed up at 6 weeks/3/6/12 months, and clinical [ASIA motor/sensory scores/grade, SCIM3, and NRS (neuropathic pain)] and radiological evaluation was performed. Results: Twenty-three and 20 patients were included in groups A and B. Two in group A were females, while others were males ( Conclusion: Administration of riluzole did not significantly improve neurological outcome/neuropathic pain in our cohort. Nevertheless, both our groups demonstrated an overall improvement in neurological outcome at 1 year, as compared with immediate post-injury status.

Indexed as

Benzothiazole moleculeNeurological deficitNeurological outcomeRiluzoleTraumatic cervical spine injury

Identifiers

PMID36507215
PMCPMC9705651
OpenAlexW4301600696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.