Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507199›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2022

PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Osteoarthritis of Knee Managed with Allogeneic vs Autologous MSCs: Efficacy and Safety Analysis.

Madhan Jeyaraman, Sathish Muthu, D S Nischith, Naveen Jeyaraman, Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Manish Khanna

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Aging Cartilage Regeneration: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Madhan JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Sri Lalithambigai Medical College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-9493
Sathish MuthuDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Uttar Pradesh, Greater Noida, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7143-4354
D S NischithIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India.
Naveen JeyaramanIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4362-3326
Arulkumar NallakumarasamyIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2445-2883
Manish KhannaIndian Stem Cell Study Group (ISCSG) Association, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2890-869X
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INDr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute · INDr. Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University · INGovernment Medical College and Hospital · INJoint Replacement Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design: Meta-analysis Objectives: Our objective is to review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have been conducted previously on the topic of osteoarthritis of the knee to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of autologous and allogeneic sources of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Materials and methods: We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until August 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing the efficacy and safety of autologous and allogeneic sources of MSCs in the management of knee osteoarthritis. These searches were conducted independently and in duplicate. The outcomes that were taken into consideration for analysis were the visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Lysholm score, and adverse events. The OpenMeta [Analyst] software was utilised to carry out the analysis in the R platform. Results: In total, 21 studies with a total of 936 patients were considered for this analysis. Because none of the studies made a direct comparison of the autologous and allogeneic sources of MSCs, we pooled the results of all of the included studies of both sources and made a comparative analysis of how the two types of MSCs fared in their respective applications. Although both allogeneic and autologous sources of MSCs demonstrated significantly better VAS improvement after 6 months ( Conclusion: Our analysis of literature showed that autologous sources of MSCs stand superior to allogeneic sources of MSC with regard to their consistent efficacy for pain, functional outcomes, and safety. However, we strongly recommend that further studies be conducted that are of a high enough quality to validate our findings and reach a consensus on the best source of MSCs for use in cellular therapy treatments for knee osteoarthritis. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00751-z.

Indexed as

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cellBone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cellCartilage regenerationKnee osteoarthritisMesenchymal stromal cellMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36507199
PMCPMC9705690
OpenAlexW4296389455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.