ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2022
PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Osteoarthritis of Knee Managed with Allogeneic vs Autologous MSCs: Efficacy and Safety Analysis.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review, umbrella review, and quality assessment on clinical translation of stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis: Are we there yet?Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Pooled it
- From microtissues to macro solutions - The future of scalable and automated cartilage tissue engineering.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study of Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Harnessing MSC Immunomodulation in Orthopedics: Clinical Insights for Comorbidities.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Models of cartilage repair with autologous mesenchymal stem cells seeded on scaffolds: a systematic narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Targeting synovial inflammation in knee osteoarthritis: translational insights for diagnosis and therapy.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Aging Cartilage Regeneration: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Evidence-based orthobiologic practice: Current evidence review and future directions.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Barriers and Solutions Towards Integrating Orthobiologics into Clinical Orthopaedic Practice.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Autologous Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate (BMAC) Therapy for Primary Knee Osteoarthritis-An Observational and Dose Escalation Study.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- The issue of heterogeneity of MSC-based advanced therapy medicinal products-a review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Knee Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Mesenchymal Stem Cells: What Else Is New? An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Factors Influencing the Yield of Progenitor Cells in Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate-A Retrospective Analysis of 58 Patients.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Mobilized Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells are Pluripotent, Safe, and Efficient in Osteoarthritis of the Knee.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Design: Meta-analysis Objectives: Our objective is to review the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have been conducted previously on the topic of osteoarthritis of the knee to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of autologous and allogeneic sources of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Materials and methods: We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until August 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing the efficacy and safety of autologous and allogeneic sources of MSCs in the management of knee osteoarthritis. These searches were conducted independently and in duplicate. The outcomes that were taken into consideration for analysis were the visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Lysholm score, and adverse events. The OpenMeta [Analyst] software was utilised to carry out the analysis in the R platform. Results: In total, 21 studies with a total of 936 patients were considered for this analysis. Because none of the studies made a direct comparison of the autologous and allogeneic sources of MSCs, we pooled the results of all of the included studies of both sources and made a comparative analysis of how the two types of MSCs fared in their respective applications. Although both allogeneic and autologous sources of MSCs demonstrated significantly better VAS improvement after 6 months ( Conclusion: Our analysis of literature showed that autologous sources of MSCs stand superior to allogeneic sources of MSC with regard to their consistent efficacy for pain, functional outcomes, and safety. However, we strongly recommend that further studies be conducted that are of a high enough quality to validate our findings and reach a consensus on the best source of MSCs for use in cellular therapy treatments for knee osteoarthritis. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00751-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.