Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507192›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2022

Diagnostic Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients.

Jun Li, Chao-E Zhou, Shan-Chen Wei, Li-Na Wang, Ming-Wei Shi, Chun-Ping Sun, Lian-Jun Lin, Xin-Min Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun LiDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-1113
Chao-E ZhouDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-3894
Shan-Chen WeiDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5195-9180
Li-Na WangDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1345-897X
Ming-Wei ShiDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-6476
Chun-Ping SunDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-8452
Lian-Jun LinDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-1522
Xin-Min LiuDepartment of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3264-5255
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of pulmonary infection and the identification of pathogens are still clinical challenges in immunocompromised patients. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has emerged as a promising infection diagnostic technique. However, its diagnostic value in immunocompromised patients needs further exploration. Purposes: This study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of mNGS compared with comprehensive conventional pathogen tests (CTs) in the etiology of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients and immunocompetent patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 53 patients who were diagnosed with pneumonia from May 2019 to June 2021. There were 32 immunocompromised patients and 21 immunocompetent patients with pneumonia who received both mNGS and CTs. The diagnostic performance was compared between mNGS and CTs in immunocompromised patients, using the composite diagnosis as the reference standard. And, the diagnostic value of mNGS for mixed infections was further analyzed. Results: Compared to immunocompetent patients, the most commonly pathogens, followed by Conclusion: mNGS is more valuable in immunocompromised patients and exhibits apparent advantages in detecting bacterial and mixed infections. It may be an alternative or complementary diagnostic method for the diagnosis of complicated infections in immunocompromised patients.

Identifiers

PMID36507192
PMCPMC9731749
OpenAlexW4311067199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.