Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507006›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2022

COVID-19 and mental health: A systematic review of international medical student surveys.

Dean C Paz, Manav Singh Bains, Morgan L Zueger, Varasiddimounish R Bandi, Victor Y Kuo, Kyle Cook, Rebecca Ryznar

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Psychological dynamics of pandemic resilience: a tale of two cultures.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dean C PazCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO, United States.
Manav Singh BainsCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO, United States.
Morgan L ZuegerCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO, United States.
Varasiddimounish R BandiCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO, United States.
Victor Y KuoCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO, United States.
Kyle CookCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO, United States.
Rebecca RyznarDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO, United States.
Rocky Vista University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The medical school curriculum has imposed psychological stressors on students worldwide, some of which may induce feelings of increased depression and anxiety. Meanwhile, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the feelings of stress, depression, and anxiety that a portion of medical students experience in their daily life. The aim of this systematic review is to gather concrete data from medical schools around the globe, and further evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted medical students' mental health. Materials and methods: Systematic search of data from PubMed, EMBASE, psycINFO, MEDLINE Complete, and Global Health for studies conducted between December 2019 and July 2021 was conducted. Data from 47 different surveys of medical students from various medical institutions throughout the world were included in this review. These surveys, administered in the form of questionnaires that utilized rating scales, measured anxiety, depression, and stress levels in medical students amidst the COVID-19 outbreak. Results: The COVID-19 outbreak was found to have negative effects on medical students, most notably causing emotional and behavioral changes and detrimental mental health impacts. Higher levels of stress, depression, and anxiety have been found in medical students since the outbreak. Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the sustained high prevalence of moderate depression, anxiety and stress among medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Appropriate support and research on which interventions could mitigate these risks is essential in order to ensure that future physicians are properly cared for, and ultimately have the adequate tools needed to provide high quality and empathetic care to future patients.

Indexed as

anxietyanxiety disorderCOVID-19depressionmedical studentsmental healthmoodSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36507006
PMCPMC9732539
OpenAlexW4310044476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.