Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506838›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2022

Toward the determination of sensitive and reliable whole-lung computed tomography features for robust standard radiomics and delta-radiomics analysis in a nonhuman primate model of coronavirus disease 2019.

Marcelo A Castro, Syed Reza, Winston T Chu, Dara Bradley, Ji Hyun Lee, Ian Crozier, Philip J Sayre, Byeong Y Lee, Venkatesh Mani, Thomas C Friedrich and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Machine Learning in Nonhuman Primate Models of Infectious Diseases: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marcelo A CastroNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-0989
Syed RezaNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Infectious Disease Imaging, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-9607
Winston T ChuNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Infectious Disease Imaging, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7818-9139
Dara BradleyNational Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Infectious Disease Imaging, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-9986
Ji Hyun LeeNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0450-2879
Ian CrozierFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2485-4011
Philip J SayreNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2256-4056
Byeong Y LeeNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1928-0455
Venkatesh ManiNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0432-2918
Thomas C FriedrichUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathobiological Sciences, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-6895
David H O'ConnorUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-470X
Courtney L FinchNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3674-3282
Gabriella WorwaNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7485-2204
Irwin M FeuersteinNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, United States.
Jens H KuhnNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-6045
Jeffrey SolomonFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-1977
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We propose a method to identify sensitive and reliable whole-lung radiomic features from computed tomography (CT) images in a nonhuman primate model of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Criteria used for feature selection in this method may improve the performance and robustness of predictive models. Approach: Fourteen crab-eating macaques were assigned to two experimental groups and exposed to either severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or a mock inoculum. High-resolution CT scans were acquired before exposure and on several post-exposure days. Lung volumes were segmented using a deep-learning methodology, and radiomic features were extracted from the original image. The reliability of each feature was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) using the mock-exposed group data. The sensitivity of each feature was assessed using the virus-exposed group data by defining a factor R that estimates the excess of variation above the maximum normal variation computed in the mock-exposed group. R and ICC were used to rank features and identify non-sensitive and unstable features. Results: Out of 111 radiomic features, 43% had excellent reliability ( Conclusions: Features were quantified and ranked based on their sensitivity and reliability. Features to be excluded to create more robust models were identified. Applicability to similar viral pneumonia studies is also possible.

Indexed as

animal modelscomputed tomographyCOVID-19radiomicsreliabilitysensitivity

Identifiers

PMID36506838
PMCPMC9731356
OpenAlexW4310874019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.