ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2022
Toward the determination of sensitive and reliable whole-lung computed tomography features for robust standard radiomics and delta-radiomics analysis in a nonhuman primate model of coronavirus disease 2019.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning in Nonhuman Primate Models of Infectious Diseases: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Review
- Review
- Computed Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning for Prediction of Histology-Based Hepatic Steatosis Scores.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Novel machine-learning analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a subclinical nonhuman primate model using radiomics and blood biomarkers.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Repeatability of computed tomography liver radiomic features in a nonhuman primate model of diet-induced steatosis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We propose a method to identify sensitive and reliable whole-lung radiomic features from computed tomography (CT) images in a nonhuman primate model of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Criteria used for feature selection in this method may improve the performance and robustness of predictive models. Approach: Fourteen crab-eating macaques were assigned to two experimental groups and exposed to either severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or a mock inoculum. High-resolution CT scans were acquired before exposure and on several post-exposure days. Lung volumes were segmented using a deep-learning methodology, and radiomic features were extracted from the original image. The reliability of each feature was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) using the mock-exposed group data. The sensitivity of each feature was assessed using the virus-exposed group data by defining a factor R that estimates the excess of variation above the maximum normal variation computed in the mock-exposed group. R and ICC were used to rank features and identify non-sensitive and unstable features. Results: Out of 111 radiomic features, 43% had excellent reliability ( Conclusions: Features were quantified and ranked based on their sensitivity and reliability. Features to be excluded to create more robust models were identified. Applicability to similar viral pneumonia studies is also possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.