Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506804›Full record

ArticleData in brief2023

An annotated high-content fluorescence microscopy dataset with Hoechst 33342-stained nuclei and manually labelled outlines.

Malou Arvidsson, Salma Kazemi Rashed, Sonja Aits

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Fate of Micronuclei.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Malou ArvidssonCell Death, Lysosomes and Artificial Intelligence Group, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden.
Salma Kazemi RashedCell Death, Lysosomes and Artificial Intelligence Group, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden.
Sonja AitsCell Death, Lysosomes and Artificial Intelligence Group, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated detection of cell nuclei in fluorescence microscopy images is a key task in bioimage analysis. It is essential for most types of microscopy-based high-throughput drug and genomic screening and is often required in smaller scale experiments as well. To develop and evaluate algorithms and neural networks that perform instance or semantic segmentation for detecting nuclei, high quality annotated data is essential. Here we present a benchmarking dataset of fluorescence microscopy images with Hoechst 33342-stained nuclei together with annotations of nuclei, nuclear fragments and micronuclei. Images were randomly selected from an RNA interference screen with a modified U2OS osteosarcoma cell line, acquired on a Thermo Fischer CX7 high-content imaging system at 20x magnification. Labelling was performed by a single annotator and reviewed by a biomedical expert. The dataset, called Aitslab-bioimaging1, contains 50 images showing over 2000 labelled nuclear objects in total, which is sufficiently large to train well-performing neural networks for instance or semantic segmentation. The dataset is split into training, development and test set for user convenience.

Indexed as

Biomedical image analysisComputer visionDeep learning training and evaluationFluorescence microscopyHigh-content screeningInstance segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36506804
PMCPMC9727632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.