Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506699›Full record

ReviewBioscience2022

A Conceptual Framework to Integrate Biodiversity, Ecosystem Function, and Ecosystem Service Models.

Sarah R Weiskopf, Bonnie J E Myers, Maria Isabel Arce-Plata, Julia L Blanchard, Simon Ferrier, Elizabeth A Fulton, Mike Harfoot, Forest Isbell, Justin A Johnson, Akira S Mori and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Informing spatial conservation prioritization with species' traits.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perspective: sustainability challenges, opportunities and solutions for long-term ecosystem observations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Exploring the Relationship between Ecosystem Services under Different Socio-Economic Driving Degrees.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sarah R WeiskopfUS Geological Survey National Climate Adaptation Science Center, in Reston, Virginia, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-8191
Bonnie J E MyersNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-2633
Maria Isabel Arce-PlataInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.
Julia L BlanchardUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Simon FerrierLand and Water, CSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Elizabeth A FultonUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Mike HarfootUnited Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.
Forest IsbellUniversity of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States.
Justin A JohnsonUniversity of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States.
Akira S MoriUniversity of Tokyo, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan.
Ensheng WengColumbia University and with the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, both New York, New York, United States.
Zuzana V HarmáCˇkováCzech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia and with the Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
María Cecilia Londoño-MurciaInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.
Brian W MillerUS Geological Survey North Central Climate Adaptation Science Center, Boulder, Colorado, United States.
Laura M PereiraUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa and with the Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Isabel M D RosaBangor University, Gwynedd, Wales, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global biodiversity and ecosystem service models typically operate independently. Ecosystem service projections may therefore be overly optimistic because they do not always account for the role of biodiversity in maintaining ecological functions. We review models used in recent global model intercomparison projects and develop a novel model integration framework to more fully account for the role of biodiversity in ecosystem function, a key gap for linking biodiversity changes to ecosystem services. We propose two integration pathways. The first uses empirical data on biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships to bridge biodiversity and ecosystem function models and could currently be implemented globally for systems and taxa with sufficient data. We also propose a trait-based approach involving greater incorporation of biodiversity into ecosystem function models. Pursuing both approaches will provide greater insight into biodiversity and ecosystem services projections. Integrating biodiversity, ecosystem function, and ecosystem service modeling will enhance policy development to meet global sustainability goals.

Indexed as

biodiversitybiodiversity–ecosystem function relationshipsecosystem functionecosystem servicesmodelingsustainabilitytrait-based modeling

Identifiers

PMID36506699
PMCPMC9718641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.