Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506663›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of ageing2022

Effects on clients' daily functioning and common features of reablement interventions: a systematic literature review.

Lise E Buma, Stan Vluggen, Sandra Zwakhalen, Gertrudis I J M Kempen, Silke F Metzelthin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07772739 (Collaborative Reablement Service Model Implementation in Community-Based Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07772739 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Collaborative Reablement Service Model Implementation in Community-Based Settings

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Taiwan UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled160ConditionsReablementArmsindividualized reablement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multidisciplinary Allied Health Reablement Model of Care for Older People in Residential Aged Care and Community Settings: Mixed-Methods Evaluation.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mapping of Reablement Research - A Scoping Review of Reviews.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Publication Trends in Reablement - A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lise E BumaDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5377-0434
Stan VluggenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sandra ZwakhalenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gertrudis I J M KempenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Silke F MetzelthinDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of reablement interventions according to the recently published ReAble definition and their effect on Activities of Daily Living (ADL). In addition, the most common and promising features of these reablement interventions were identified. Four electronic bibliographic databases were searched. Articles were included when published between 2002 and 2020, which described a Randomised or Clinical Controlled Trial of a reablement intervention matching the criteria of the ReAble definition, and had ADL functioning as an outcome. Snowball sampling and expert completion were used to detect additional publications. Two researchers screened and extracted the identified articles and assessed methodological quality; discrepancies were resolved by discussion and arbitration by a third researcher. Twenty relevant studies from eight countries were included. Ten of these studies were effective in improving ADL functioning. Identifying promising features was challenging as an equal amount of effective and non-effective interventions were included, content descriptions were often lacking, and study quality was moderate to low. However, there are indications that the use of more diverse interdisciplinary teams, a standardised assessment and goal-setting method and four or more intervention components (i.e. ADL-training, physical and/or functional exercise, education, management of functional disorders) can improve daily functioning. No conclusions could be drawn concerning the effectiveness on ADL functioning. The common elements identified can provide guidance when developing reablement programmes. Intervention protocols and process evaluations should be published more often using reporting guidelines. Collecting additional data from reablement experts could help to unpack the black box of reablement. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-022-00693-3.

Indexed as

Activities of daily livingDaily functioningIndependencePerson-centredReablement

Identifiers

PMID36506663
PMCPMC9729664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.