Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506636›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Loss of dental tissue after restoration or sealing of occlusal carious lesions: 3-4-year results of randomized clinical trials.

Rafaela L C Carraro, Vânia Fontanella, Joana Christina Carvalho, Luana Severo Alves, Marisa Maltz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafaela L C CarraroDepartment of Social and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Vânia FontanellaDepartment of Surgery and Orthopedics, Faculty of Odontology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Joana Christina CarvalhoFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, Brazil.
Luana Severo AlvesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Marisa MaltzDepartment of Social and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUCLouvain · BEUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Although preservation of the tooth structure is quoted as the main advantage of sealing of carious lesions, there are no long-term studies comparing the maintenance of dental tissue after restoration or after caries sealing. Aim: To measure the radiographically visible loss of dental tissue after conventional restoration and sealing of carious lesions. Subjects and Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled clinical trials, one conducted in Brazil and another in Belgium, which evaluated two different therapies for the treatment of occlusal carious lesions in permanent teeth: sealant (SE) without previous carious tissue removal or restoration (RE) with total removal of carious dentin. The greater depth and width of sealed carious lesions and restorations were compared. Statistical Analysis: The independent Results: Carious lesions in the RE and SE groups showed similar measurements at baseline ( Conclusion: Sealing of carious lesions resulted in greater preservation of dental tissue.

Indexed as

Dental cariesdental radiographydental restorationdental sealantrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID36506636
PMCPMC9733557
OpenAlexW4297812108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.