Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506625›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Comparative evaluation of bioglass nanofiber, dexamethasone-coated bioglass nanofiber, and platelet-rich fibrin, as scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic teeth: A randomized controlled trial.

Sakshi Gupta, Neelam Mittal, Harakh Chand Baranwal, Chandana Rath, Thivya Shankari, Supriya Gupta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sakshi GuptaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, FODS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Neelam MittalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, FODS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Harakh Chand BaranwalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, FODS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Chandana RathDepartment of Materials Science, IIT, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Thivya ShankariDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, FODS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Supriya GuptaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, FODS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Indian Institute of Technology BHU · INBanaras Hindu University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the regenerative endodontic potential of dexamethasone-coated bioglass nanofiber (Dex-BGnf), bioglass nanofiber (BGnf), and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) for inducing regeneration in necrotic immature permanent teeth. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 ( Statistical Analysis: One-way ANOVA, Results: Clinically, all the 36 teeth were asymptomatic, but none gave a positive response to Electric Pulp Test (EPT) in time interval of 12 months. Dex-BGnf showed a statistically significant improvement in terms of increase in root length ( Conclusion: The study has shown that Dex-BGnf yielded significantly better results than PRF for inducing apexogenesis in necrotic immature teeth.

Indexed as

Bioglass nanofiberdexamethasonenanotopographyplatelet-rich fibrinregeneration

Identifiers

PMID36506625
PMCPMC9733549
OpenAlexW4297812073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.