ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2022
Neurointerventional tools and techniques for coronary thrombus removal. A case-based review.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the negative results of randomized aspiration thrombectomy studies, its role in myocardial infarction has been limited to high thrombus burden and/or failed vessel recanalization, with little technological advancement over the last years. In contrast, there has been rapid progress in mechanical thrombectomy in stroke, which is understandable as most ischemic cerebrovascular accidents have an embolic etiology.We present three transradial procedures wherein neurointerventional catheters were used as a first-line device for Learning objective: In the case of large clots, where coronary aspiration devices fail, neurointerventional catheters may be considered as a rescue strategy. They provide large aspiration lumen and excellent trackability with atraumatic design. Many other neurointerventional techniques can be easily adopted into the coronary armamentarium, possibly increasing the safety and efficacy of thrombus aspiration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.