Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506464›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2022

Sex differences in epigenetic age in Mediterranean high longevity regions.

Hannah-Ruth Engelbrecht, Sarah M Merrill, Nicole Gladish, Julie L MacIsaac, David T S Lin, Simone Ecker, Christina A Chrysohoou, Giovanni M Pes, Michael S Kobor, David H Rehkopf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Hannah-Ruth EngelbrechtEdwin S. H. Leong Healthy Aging Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sarah M MerrillEdwin S. H. Leong Healthy Aging Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nicole GladishDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Julie L MacIsaacDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
David T S LinDepartment of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Simone EckerUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christina A ChrysohoouFirst Cardiology Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Giovanni M PesDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Michael S KoborEdwin S. H. Leong Healthy Aging Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
David H RehkopfDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
University of British Columbia · CABC Children's Hospital · CAStanford University · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in aging manifest in disparities in disease prevalence, physical health, and lifespan, where women tend to have greater longevity relative to men. However, in the Mediterranean Blue Zones of Sardinia (Italy) and Ikaria (Greece) are regions of centenarian abundance, male-female centenarian ratios are approximately one, diverging from the typical trend and making these useful regions in which to study sex differences of the oldest old. Additionally, these regions can be investigated as examples of healthy aging relative to other populations. DNA methylation (DNAm)-based predictors have been developed to assess various health biomarkers, including biological age, Pace of Aging, serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), and telomere length. Epigenetic clocks are biological age predictors whose deviation from chronological age has been indicative of relative health differences between individuals, making these useful tools for interrogating these differences in aging. We assessed sex differences between the Horvath, Hannum, GrimAge, PhenoAge, Skin and Blood, and Pace of Aging predictors from individuals in two Mediterranean Blue Zones and found that men displayed positive epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) compared to women according to all clocks, with significantly greater rates according to GrimAge (β = 3.55;

Indexed as

biological agebiomarkerblue zonecentenarianDNA methylationepigenetic clocktelomere

Identifiers

PMID36506464
PMCPMC9726738
OpenAlexW4309699822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.