Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506386›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Alginate/pectin dressing with niosomal mangosteen extract for enhanced wound healing: evaluating skin irritation by structure-activity relationship.

Philaslak Pooprommin, Chawan Manaspon, Anupma Dwivedi, Anisha Mazumder, Surat Sangkaew, Smith Wanmasae, Jitbanjong Tangpong, Tassanee Ongtanasup, Komgrit Eawsakul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring Synergistic Inhibition of Inflammatory and Antioxidant Potential: IntegratedAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Philaslak PoopromminSchool of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Chawan ManasponBiomedical Engineering Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Anupma DwivediFaculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Anisha MazumderFaculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Surat SangkaewSchool of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Smith WanmasaeSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Jitbanjong TangpongSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Tassanee OngtanasupSchool of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Komgrit EawsakulSchool of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Walailak University · THCharles University · CZChiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most modern wound dressings assist the wound-healing process. In contrast, conventional wound dressings have limited antibacterial activity and promote sporadic fibroblast growth. Therefore, wound dressings with prolonged substance release must be improved. This research aimed to develop hydrogel films. These were synthesized from alginate and pectin, incorporated with mangosteen extract (ME), and encapsulated in niosomes (ME-loaded niosomes). Subsequently, we examined the in vitro release and physical characteristics of ME-loaded niosomes. These characteristics included particle pH, size, charge, polydispersity index (PDI), and drug loading properties. These properties included drug loading content (DLC), entrapment efficiency (EE), and yield (Y). Additionally, we examined the swelling ratio and biological characteristics of the hydrogel film. These characteristics included antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity (L929), cell attachment to the tested materials, cell migration, hemocompatibility, and in vivo irritation. Significant results were obtained using a 2:1 niosome preparation containing Span60 and cholesterol. Ratio influenced size, charge, PDI, DLC, EE, and Y. The results were 225.5 ± 5.83 nm, negatively charged, 0.38, 16.2 ± 0.87%, 64.8 ± 3.49%, and 87.3 ± 3.09%, respectively. Additionally, the release of encapsulated ME was pH sensitive because 85% of the ME can be released at a pH of 5.5 within seven days and decrease to 70% at a pH of 7.4. The maximum swelling ratios of patches with 0.5% and 1% Ca

Indexed as

HydrogelMangosteen extractNiosomeSkin irritation

Identifiers

PMID36506386
PMCPMC9727648
OpenAlexW4311286370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.