ArticleHeliyon2022
Mapping knowledge domains on managerial overconfidence.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on bioactive compounds of microalgae as antioxidants in a bibliometric analysis and visualization perspective.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Managerial overconfidence issues have attracted extant research interest given its influence on corporate strategy and operating performance with the growing development of modern behavioural economics. In this paper, bibliometric tools of VOSviewer and CiteSpace are used to reflect the research trend, hot spots and evolving route of managerial overconfidence theme. The publishing and citation numbers of managerial overconfidence paper are experiencing an overall increasing trend from 1992 to 2021. We sum up the top source journal, institutions, countries and the top 10 highly cited papers, and 272 keywords are distributed in the occurrence graph related to the theme of managerial overconfidence. Twelve keyword clusters from individual, organisational and social levels are identified. The research span is divided into four periods: preliminary, exploratory, growth and outbreak periods, and important research hot spots are summed up with highly cited keywords. The extant literature measurement and variables of managerial overconfidence are summarised in four types, and the integrated research frame of managerial overconfidence is proposed. Future research expansion of managerial overconfidence can be carried out from five aspects of harmony classification, improved measurement, multivariate test, positive paradigm and cultural distinction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.