ArticleHeliyon2022
Evaluating spatial accessibility of cultural urban land use by using improved 2SFCA method in Xi'an, China.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the spatial equity of the aged care institutions based on the improved potential model: a case study in Shanghai, China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With rapid urbanization, contradictions between rapid economic development and a lack of spiritual culture become increasingly complicated. Accessibility is a useful spatial quantitative index to evaluate the spiritual and cultural construction of the city. Amongst various accessibility methods, the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method is suitable for evaluating cultural urban land use (CULU) based on its advantage of flexibility and rationality. This study selects Xi'an as the representative ancient city. Based on comparing accessibility results between different travel modes (walk, bus, subway, and total), and analyzing through statistics, Z-score, and comparison of classification, comparison of a particular area, we obtain the characteristics of CULU accessibility in Xi'an. Firstly, for different travel modes, the distribution of CULU accessibility value in Xi'an is imbalanced, and the accessibility value of bus and subway is closely related to public transport resources. Secondly, CULU in Xi'an has apparent features of being dense in the center, sparse in the suburbs, and lack edge, which correspond to the development of the city. Finally, about 60% accessibility value is contributed by historical CULU, which reflects the typical characteristics of Xi'an as an ancient city with rich historical resources. This study profoundly analyses the attributes of CULU in Xi'an and provides essential data for decision-makers. Furthermore, it gives a significant exploration for building a CULU evaluation system in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.