Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506316›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022

Applications of machine learning in metabolomics: Disease modeling and classification.

Aya Galal, Marwa Talal, Ahmed Moustafa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Bayesian selection of lipidome dynamics features for a K-nearest neighbors (KNN) classifier model of tumor response in patients with advanced gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma undergoing systemic treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aya GalalSystems Genomics Laboratory, American University in Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt.
Marwa TalalSystems Genomics Laboratory, American University in Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed MoustafaSystems Genomics Laboratory, American University in Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics research has recently gained popularity because it enables the study of biological traits at the biochemical level and, as a result, can directly reveal what occurs in a cell or a tissue based on health or disease status, complementing other omics such as genomics and transcriptomics. Like other high-throughput biological experiments, metabolomics produces vast volumes of complex data. The application of machine learning (ML) to analyze data, recognize patterns, and build models is expanding across multiple fields. In the same way, ML methods are utilized for the classification, regression, or clustering of highly complex metabolomic data. This review discusses how disease modeling and diagnosis can be enhanced via deep and comprehensive metabolomic profiling using ML. We discuss the general layout of a metabolic workflow and the fundamental ML techniques used to analyze metabolomic data, including support vector machines (SVM), decision trees, random forests (RF), neural networks (NN), and deep learning (DL). Finally, we present the advantages and disadvantages of various ML methods and provide suggestions for different metabolic data analysis scenarios.

Indexed as

biomarkersdeep learningmachine learningmetabolic disordersmetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID36506316
PMCPMC9730048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.