Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506253›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2022

Chicken RAPS: Chicken Robot-assisted Pyeloplasty Simulation. Validation Study of a Novel Chicken Model for Wet Laboratory Training in Robot-assisted Pyeloplasty.

Nikolaos Liakos, Rudolf Moritz, Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, Özlem Güner, Jörn H Witt, Christian Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nikolaos LiakosDepartment of Urology, Medical Centre of the University of Freiburg, Germany.
Rudolf MoritzDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany.
Sami-Ramzi Leyh-BannurahDepartment of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urological Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Gronau, Germany.
Özlem GünerEuropean Robotic Institute Training Center, Gronau, Germany.
Jörn H WittDepartment of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urological Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Gronau, Germany.
Christian WagnerDepartment of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urological Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Gronau, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, the number of simulation models available for teaching new surgeons has continued to increase. Objective: To evaluate and validate use of a model for teaching robot-assisted pyeloplasty. Design setting and participants: Twenty simulated robot-assisted pyeloplasty procedures were performed by experienced ( Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We evaluated the time needed to perform the procedure, and the sufficiency and patency of the anastomosis. Participants rated the efficiency, face validity, and possible acceptance of the model as part of a structured curriculum on a scale from 0 to10. Statistical significance for comparison of results was set at Results and limitations: Robot-assisted pyeloplasty was successfully performed by 75% of the participants. The completion time was significantly higher in the novice group ( Conclusions: The chicken crop model is a low-cost and reproducible simulation model for accomplishing both the resection and reconstructive steps during the learning phase for robot-assisted pyeloplasty. Patient summary: We assessed the use of chickens as a model for practicing a robot-assisted operation called pyeloplasty to fix narrowing of the ureter (the tube that drains urine from the kidney to the bladder) where it attaches to the kidney. This model can be used for simulation of robot-assisted pyeloplasty when training new robotic surgeons.

Indexed as

ModelPyeloplastyRobot-assistedSimulationTraining

Identifiers

PMID36506253
PMCPMC9732448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.