ArticleACS omega2022
Research on Factors and Influencing Correlation of Coal Core Temperature during Coring.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The core-tube method is a common method to measure the coal seam gas content (CSGC). However, cutting heat and friction heat will be generated in the core-tube coring process, which will increase the coal core temperature and the coal core gas loss, thus resulting in a large error in the determination of the gas content. The accuracy of the gas content determination is closely related to the temperature variation of coal core during core-taking. Based on this, the team developed the "thermal effect simulation device of coal core in the core-taking process" and carried out the temperature change test experiment of the coal core in the core-taking process under different conditions. The results show that the temperature variation of the coal core during the core-taking process shows four stages: constant temperature, rapid temperature rise, slow temperature rise, and temperature drop. The temperature rise rate, temperature rise duration, and temperature rise peak of the coal core increase with the increase in rotate speed, coal strength, friction area, and frictional load. In the axial direction, the closer to the upper end of the core pipe, the higher the core temperature. In the radial direction, the closer the core is to the wall of the core pipe, the higher the core temperature is. Under the influence of cutting heat and friction heat in the process of core-taking, the maximum heating rate of the core-taking tube wall within 8 min is 20 °C/min, the peak temperature is 158.4 °C, the average temperature of the wall is above 100 °C, and the average temperature rise of the coal core reaches 55.7 °C. Within 60 min, the average temperature of the coal core remained above 50 °C. The order of influence of coal core temperature from large to small is as follows: rotate speed, frictional load, friction area, and coal strength. It can provide a reference for accurately determining CSGC using the core-tube method or designing a coring device to eliminate or reduce the thermal effect during coring.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.