Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36506136›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Active Bending of Disordered Microtubule Bundles by Kinesin Motors.

Vahid Nasirimarekani, Smrithika Subramani, Sebastian Herzog, Andrej Vilfan, Isabella Guido

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Vahid NasirimarekaniMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPIDS), Am Fassberg 17, 37077Göttingen, Germany.
Smrithika SubramaniMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPIDS), Am Fassberg 17, 37077Göttingen, Germany.
Sebastian HerzogMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPIDS), Am Fassberg 17, 37077Göttingen, Germany.
Andrej VilfanMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPIDS), Am Fassberg 17, 37077Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8985-6072
Isabella GuidoMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization (MPIDS), Am Fassberg 17, 37077Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-3767
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization · DEJožef Stefan Institute · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active networks of biopolymers and motor proteins in vitro self-organize and exhibit dynamic structures on length scales much larger than the interacting individual components of which they consist. How the dynamics is related across the range of length scales is still an open question. Here, we experimentally characterize and quantify the dynamic behavior of isolated microtubule bundles that bend due to the activity of motor proteins. At the motor level, we track and describe the motion features of kinesin-1 clusters stepping within the bending bundles. We find that there is a separation of length scales by at least 1 order of magnitude. At a run length of <1 μm, kinesin-1 activity leads to a bundle curvature in the range of tens of micrometers. We propose that the distribution of microtubule polarity plays a crucial role in the bending dynamics that we observe at both the bundle and motor levels. Our results contribute to the understanding of fundamental principles of vital intracellular processes by disentangling the multiscale dynamics in out-of-equilibrium active networks composed of cytoskeletal elements.

Identifiers

PMID36506136
PMCPMC9730755
OpenAlexW4309474885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.