Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505976›Full record

ArticleAdvanced functional materials2022

Engineered Spider Silk Proteins for Biomimetic Spinning of Fibers with Toughness Equal to Dragline Silks.

Tina Arndt, Gabriele Greco, Benjamin Schmuck, Jessica Bunz, Olga Shilkova, Juanita Francis, Nicola M Pugno, Kristaps Jaudzems, Andreas Barth, Jan Johansson and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced functional materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Liquid-liquid phase separation enables chromatography-free purification and high-performance spidroin-amyloid hybrid silk fibers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Exploring the functional properties ofMaterials today. Communications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Tina ArndtDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition Karolinska Institutet Neo Huddinge 14183 Sweden.
Gabriele GrecoLaboratory for Bioinspired, Bionic, Nano, Meta, Materials & Mechanics Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering University of Trento Via Mesiano 77 Trento 38123 Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-7081
Benjamin SchmuckDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition Karolinska Institutet Neo Huddinge 14183 Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4021-6458
Jessica BunzDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition Karolinska Institutet Neo Huddinge 14183 Sweden.
Olga ShilkovaDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition Karolinska Institutet Neo Huddinge 14183 Sweden.
Juanita FrancisDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition Karolinska Institutet Neo Huddinge 14183 Sweden.
Nicola M PugnoLaboratory for Bioinspired, Bionic, Nano, Meta, Materials & Mechanics Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering University of Trento Via Mesiano 77 Trento 38123 Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2136-2396
Kristaps JaudzemsDepartment of Physical Organic Chemistry Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis Riga LV-1006 Latvia.
Andreas BarthDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics The Arrhenius Laboratories for Natural Sciences Stockholm University Stockholm 10691 Sweden.
Jan JohanssonDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition Karolinska Institutet Neo Huddinge 14183 Sweden.
Anna RisingDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition Karolinska Institutet Neo Huddinge 14183 Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-1207
Karolinska Institutet · SELatvijas Organiskās Sintēzes Institūts · LVQueen Mary University of London · GBStockholm University · SEUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spider silk is the toughest fiber found in nature, and bulk production of artificial spider silk that matches its mechanical properties remains elusive. Development of miniature spider silk proteins (mini-spidroins) has made large-scale fiber production economically feasible, but the fibers' mechanical properties are inferior to native silk. The spider silk fiber's tensile strength is conferred by poly-alanine stretches that are zipped together by tight side chain packing in β-sheet crystals. Spidroins are secreted so they must be void of long stretches of hydrophobic residues, since such segments get inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. At the same time, hydrophobic residues have high β-strand propensity and can mediate tight inter-β-sheet interactions, features that are attractive for generation of strong artificial silks. Protein production in prokaryotes can circumvent biological laws that spiders, being eukaryotic organisms, must obey, and the authors thus design mini-spidroins that are predicted to more avidly form stronger β-sheets than the wildtype protein. Biomimetic spinning of the engineered mini-spidroins indeed results in fibers with increased tensile strength and two fiber types display toughness equal to native dragline silks. Bioreactor expression and purification result in a protein yield of ≈9 g L

Indexed as

biomimetic materialsbiomimetic spider silk fibersfibersprotein engineeringrecombinant protein production

Identifiers

PMID36505976
PMCPMC9720699
OpenAlexW4229070144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.