Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505962›Full record

ArticleF&S reviews2022

Assisted Reproductive Technology or Infertility: What underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Judy E Stern, Leslie V Farland, Sunah S Hwang, Dmitry Dukhovny, Charles C Coddington, Howard J Cabral, Stacey A Missmer, Eugene Declercq, Hafsatou Diop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Judy E SternDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock and the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Leslie V FarlandDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona.
Sunah S HwangSection of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine.
Dmitry DukhovnyDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University.
Charles C CoddingtonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center, University of North Carolina.
Howard J CabralDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health.
Stacey A MissmerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University.
Eugene DeclercqDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health.
Hafsatou DiopDivision of MCH Research and Analysis, Massachusetts Department of Public Health.

Funding

Women's Health After Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Population-Based StudyR01HD067270 · NICHD · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI DIOP, HAFSATOU, STERN, JUDY E · 2011 to 2020
$7.4M
Child Health After Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Population-Based StudyR01HD064595 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI DECLERCQ, EUGENE R, DIOP, HAFSATOU · 2010 to 2014
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD064595NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that assisted reproductive technology (ART: defined here as including only

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technology (ART)child healthmaternal healthplacental abnormalitiespreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID36505962
PMCPMC9733832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.