Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505949›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2022

Clinical and occupational risk factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in healthcare personnel.

Jennie H Kwon, Philip J Budge, Caroline A O'Neil, Kate Peacock, Eva M Aagaard, Victoria J Fraser, Margaret A Olsen, Hilary Babcock, CDC Prevention Epicenters Program

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. SARS-CoV-2 anti-N antibodies among healthcare personnel without previous known COVID-19.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennie H KwonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7824-6276
Philip J BudgeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0069-2372
Caroline A O'NeilDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2966-0750
Kate PeacockDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Eva M AagaardDivision of General Medicine and Occupational Health, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-0923
Victoria J FraserDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Margaret A OlsenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7070-9320
Hilary BabcockDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9015-8378
CDC Prevention Epicenters Program

Funding

IMPROVED ANTIGEN DETECTION TESTS FOR FILARIAL INFECTIONSK08AI121422 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BUDGE, PHILIP · 2016 to 2020
$856k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI121422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify characteristics associated with positive severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests in healthcare personnel. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A multihospital healthcare system. Participants: Employees who reported SARS-CoV-2 exposures and/or symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) between March 30, 2020, and September 20, 2020, and were subsequently referred for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. Methods: Data from exposure and/or symptom reports were linked to the corresponding SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result. Employee demographic characteristics, occupational characteristics, SARS-CoV-2 exposure history, and symptoms were evaluated as potential risk factors for having a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Results: Among 6,289 employees who received SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing, 873 (14%) had a positive test. Independent risk factors for a positive PCR included: working in a patient care area (relative risk [RR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-2.40), having a known SARS-CoV-2 exposure (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37), reporting a community versus an occupational exposure (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.49-2.34), and having an infected household contact (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 2.11-2.89). Nearly all HCP (99%) reported symptoms. Symptoms associated with a positive PCR in a multivariable analysis included loss of sense of smell (RR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.09-3.24) or taste (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.40-2.20), cough (RR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.40-2.20), fever, and muscle aches. Conclusions: In this cohort of >6,000 healthcare system and academic medical center employees early in the pandemic, community exposures, and particularly household exposures, were associated with greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than occupational exposures. This work highlights the importance of COVID-19 prevention in the community and in healthcare settings to prevent COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID36505949
PMCPMC9727206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.