ArticleiScience2022
Prediction of ground-level ozone by SOM-NARX hybrid neural network based on the correlation of predictors.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current approaches to ozone prediction using hybrid neural networks are numerous but not perfect. Decomposition algorithms ignore the correlation between predictors and ozone, and feature extraction methods rarely select appropriate predictors in terms of correlation, especially for VOCs. Therefore, this study proposes a hybrid neural network model SOM-NARX based on the correlation of predictors. The model is based on MIC to filter predictors, using SOM to make predictors as feature sequences and using NARX networks to make predictions. Data from the JCDZURI site were used for training, testing, and validation. The results show that the correlation of the predictors, classification numbers of SOM, neuron numbers, and delay steps can affect prediction accuracy. Model comparison shows that the SOM-NARX model has 13.82, 10.60, 6.58% and 12.05, 9.44, 68.14% RMSE, MAE, and MAEP in winter and summer, which is smaller than CNN-LSTM, CNN-BiLSTM, CNN-GRU, SOM-LSTM, SOM-BiLSTM, and SOM-GRU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.