ArticleiScience2022
The time-course of real-world scene perception: Spatial and semantic processing.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A method for measuring closed-loop latency in gaze-contingent rendering without extra equipment.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Cortical Encoding of Spatial Structure and Semantic Content in 3D Natural Scenes.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-world scene perception unfolds remarkably quickly, yet the underlying visual processes are poorly understood. Space-centered theory maintains that a scene's spatial structure (e.g., openness, mean depth) can be rapidly recovered from low-level image statistics. In turn, the statistical relationship between a scene's spatial properties and semantic content allows for semantic identity to be inferred from its layout. We tested this theory by investigating (1) the temporal dynamics of spatial and semantic perception in real-world scenes, and (2) dependencies between spatial and semantic judgments. Participants viewed backward-masked images for 13.3 to 106.7 ms, and identified the semantic (e.g., beach, road) or spatial structure (e.g., open, closed-off) category. We found no temporal precedence of spatial discrimination relative to semantic discrimination. Computational analyses further suggest that, instead of using spatial layout to infer semantic categories, humans exploit semantic information to discriminate spatial structure categories. These findings challenge traditional 'bottom-up' views of scene perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.