Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36505871›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

The 2022 ENCR Recommendations on recording and reporting of urothelial tumours of the urinary tract.

Jaume Galceran, David Parada, Michael Eden, Rosario Tumino, Anne Yvonne Warren, Carmen Martos, Luciana Neamtiu, Otto Visser, Laetitia Daubisse-Marliac

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Jaume GalceranCancer Epidemiology and Prevention Service, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain.
David ParadaPathology Service, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain.
Michael EdenNHS Digital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rosario TuminoCancer Registry and Histopathology Department, Provincial Health Authority (ASP), Ragusa, Italy.
Anne Yvonne WarrenCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Carmen MartosEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Luciana NeamtiuEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Otto VisserNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands.
Laetitia Daubisse-MarliacClaudius Regaud Institute, IUCT-O, Tarn Cancer Registry, Toulouse, France.
Joint Research Centre · ITCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili · ESNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLNHS Digital · GBUniversitat Rovira i Virgili · ESUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An updated European Network of Cancer registries (ENCR) Recommendations on Recording and Reporting of Urothelial Tumours of the Urinary Tract had been published in 2022. After the publication by the ENCR of the "Recommendations for coding bladder cancers" in 1995, knowledge about the biology and pathology of urinary tract tumors and their classification has varied and increased substantially. On the other hand, several studies have shown that cancer registries use different definitions, criteria for inclusion and coding of urothelial tumors. This great variability among registries affects not only the criteria for recording (registration, coding and classification) but also the criteria of reporting (counting in the statistics of incidence and survival) urinary tract tumors. This causes difficulties in the data comparability from different registries. Recording and reporting of urothelial tumors requires the application of standard criteria that must take into account the combination of the multiple aspects as the primary topography, the histological type, the grade, the extent of invasion, the multi-centricity, the progressions and the time interval between tumors. This led to the creation of a Working Group of the ENCR that developed these recommendations on the recording and reporting of urothelial tumors of the urinary tract. This article reports these recommendations and the rationale for each.

Indexed as

bladder cancercancer registryEuroperecommendationsrecordingregistration practicesreportingurothelial tumors

Identifiers

PMID36505871
PMCPMC9727225
OpenAlexW4309713342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.